Bucko wrote to j0HNNY a1PHA <=-
Thanks.. Appreciate the comment.. Main reason I Went to Proxmox was I
was getting worried about losing my U64 to a lightning hit, or my LT Kernal..
I was running a 32-bit OS on a system with 8 GB of RAM and didn't want
the ram above 4GB to go to waste - so I installed Proxmox, virtualized
the BBS, and got enough headroom to run a couple of small VMs on the
same hardware that had run the BBS only. And, Snapshots! I love being
able to take a snapshot before upgrading the BBS.
Lots of roads lead to proxmox. :)
I was running a 32-bit OS on a system with 8 GB of RAM and didn't want
the ram above 4GB to go to waste - so I installed Proxmox, virtualized
the BBS, and got enough headroom to run a couple of small VMs on the
same hardware that had run the BBS only. And, Snapshots! I love being
able to take a snapshot before upgrading the BBS.
computer I had found in the garbage, install Mystic, C-Net Amiga, and[...]
real hardware, I said enough. 1 computer all the systems. 64gigs ram,
8TB storage, and a Ryzen 12 core processor. No issues anymore. It all
runs on that machine with Proxmox. Nothing better..
How are you tackling the mouse issue with a virtual Amiga setup?
Everytime I've tried the various Amiga emulators in a virtual
enviroment,
the mouse has gone mad and tracking is a total flop.
Yes indeed they do.. Back in 2018, my plan was to run Virtual Box on a computer I had found in the garbage, install Mystic, C-Net Amiga, and Synchronet on it. Well the system wasn't enough to do it. I ran all of them on seperate computers, then after running 2 Commodore boards on
real hardware, I said enough. 1 computer all the systems. 64gigs ram,
8TB storage, and a Ryzen 12 core processor. No issues anymore. It all
runs on that machine with Proxmox. Nothing better..
For those of you not running on remote servers, it'd be really
interesting to see some photos of your actual BBS machine. For those
who are users, it'd be interesting to see what your battlestations / computer setup looks like.
I've always been interested in this. In the early days, a computer
was a device in a room generally used for another purpose. As time
has gone by, the presence of the computer in the room has led to reconfiguration of the rooms themselves to some extent.
So.
Anyone got any photographs?
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
tenser wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Would it have? If the CPU supports PAE (or the equivalent for
other architectures) you can still make use of the RAM, just
not in a single virtual address space.
the bbs computer resides in my office, near the entrance :)
http://bbs.roonsbbs.hu/bbs1.jpg
http://bbs.roonsbbs.hu/bbs2.jpg
tenser wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Would it have? If the CPU supports PAE (or the equivalent for
other architectures) you can still make use of the RAM, just
not in a single virtual address space.
I didn't know that - all I knew was that 32-bit Windows would show a maximum of 3.xGB available.
All I know of PAE are that older Thinkpads supported PAE but didn't advertise it, so you'd need to jump through hoops to get some 32-bit linuxes to install. There was a package called "fakepae" that would
report support for it.
Hi Bucko,
How are you tackling the mouse issue with a virtual Amiga setup?
Everytime I've tried the various Amiga emulators in a virtual enviroment, the mouse has gone mad and tracking is a total flop.
It makes using the system a non-starter to begin with.
Same question!
Bucko: have you used AmiKit on proxmox?
How are you running your Amiga boards? I was thinking of using Amithlon but am not sure this would work. I mean, I guess I can just give it a
shot but am curious to see how you're doing things.
No I played with AmiKit free edition one time on a real machine but
didn't like the bloat of it, call me a purist. LOL Just a quick add on
for mouse issue.. Go to this link and peruse K-Guides install
instructions for C-Net Amiga.. I use these settings on my setups and
have no issues at all...
the mouse has gone mad and tracking is a total flop.[...]
It makes using the system a non-starter to begin with.
Actually, I have no issue at all with it. I have USB mouse ticked in Miscellaneous settings, and I think that is it.. In Proxmox I didn't
do anything special for the mouse.. I have heard people having issues,
but I have been running in Emulation now for a good 8 months with
nothing..
I literally just re-purposed my proxmox server for my Talisman
Ubuntu server... It's a an old but still beefy gaming rig, so thinking about returning to proxmox, but on another unit. I've got some older PCs laying around, but they may be underpowered for multiple VMs... I do
love me some proxmox tho
Hi Bucko,
What about accessing the Amiga system, is that just done through the proxmox console into the host vm? Or do you also install some sort of remote acess system? (Ie: anydesk/vnc etc)
tenser wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Huh. It's enabled by setting a bit in %cr4, and you can
probe support for it via CPUID. My guess is that the
ThinkPad CPU probably supported the CR4 bit (and the updated
page table format) but didn't advertise it in the relevant
CPUID leaf; probably an oversight in the BIOS. :-(
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 124 |
| Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 08:41:01 |
| Calls: | 7,582 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 9,363 |
| D/L today: |
562 files (216M bytes) |
| Messages: | 391,100 |
| Posted today: | 1 |