Nightfox wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
One thing I'm still not comfortable with regarding web apps is that if your internet service goes down, you'll be unable to access/run those programs. I still like to have locally-installed software.
esc wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
It's time to embrace the horror. The web Microsoft365 apps run pretty
well and provide a much fuller experience than G Suite - and run well
on Linux browsers.
I'm not sure I agree about the M365 vs GSuite - I have been on GSuite since January and previously on Microsoft products and I far and away prefer GSuite for collaboration. But I guess it's subjective. *shrug*
Weatherman wrote to Poindexter Fortran <=-
Fortunately, Google made the right decision to continue to allow the
early adopters with custom domains on the legacy free tier. It is suprising to me that Microsoft pricing is lower than Google in that
space.
Before that decision was made, I was ready to ditch Google and host my
own email again. I had everything ready to go - as there is no way I
will pay business rates for personal/family access. For some unknown reason, Google doesn't offer a family plan at all for G Suite. Very
odd and in my opinion, they could get more revenue if they did offer a family tier like Microsoft.
Weatherman wrote to Poindexter Fortran <=-
Using eCS to manage a modern virtual environment - that rocks!
eCS and Arca OS both run fine on ESXi 6.7. I have never found an operating system that doesn't run in a virtual environment.
Warpslide wrote to Nightfox <=-
We recently explored various Microsoft cloud offerings, one of them
being something called "Universal Print". This moves your print server
to the cloud and also lets you set permissions for your various
locations as to who can print where, all kind of neat.
Until you realize that if you loose internet access, you can't print.
You could be sitting right next to a printer, on the same network, but
if your location loses internet access, no printing for you.
killer wrote to Warpslide <=-
Surprising what actually gets implemented. Feel like at times it is security through obscurity. Once IBM gets their hands in a cookie jar they have a tendency to keep a tight grip on things.
killer wrote to Atreyu <=-
Makes spying on your competitors so much easier when their data is all stored in the cloud and they don't notice the extra resource
consumption as your are indexing their data.
Google started in the cloud. Microsoft is dragging everyone, kicking and screaming to the cloud. It is all about the control and recurring revenue. TheI don't mind the cloud, as long as I can choose who my masters are. I am
old model of buy hardware or an OS and keep that running for 15+ years is not
acceptable to companies these days.
My killer app is still Outlook, though - with a full-fledged mobile
client like Nine, I can use my notes field for data capture and fully populate the tasks and calendar, and do most of my organization in one
app. If G suite gave tasks a solid app, it'd be a contender for me.
I had an early legacy free tier account, and back around 2010 they
offered a free trial of the paid features - and sneakily, no way to go
back to the free tier.
I tried in Proxmox and could install eCS but not boot. I should try
again, as I was probably one of the earliest adopters of OS/2 around
here. I used OS/2 1.2 before it had a GUI!
I don't mind the cloud, as long as I can choose who my masters are. I am using Proton as my provider right now.
Sometimes it can be what a person is more accustomed to using. I
always thought Groupwise calendar was much better than Outlook, but I
also way more used to using Groupwise years ago.
I wrote a book using Google Docs, and even when I was without internet access, could still access the doc and make offline changes. I haven't tried that with Microsoft365 yet.
Groupwise! There's a name I haven't thought about in awhile. I worked at a place that was still running Groupwise when I started there in 2009. I dragged them away from that to Exchange (and later Office 365).
When we went to Exchange/Outlook the most common question I got was "how
do I
know if they've read my email" as with Groupwise you could check to see if the message had both been delivered & then read if you were sending to someone internal. I showed them how to ask for read receipts in Outlook
but they complained "it's not the same!".
My spin on it was that OS/2 multitasked DOS apps amazingly well (being able to run DOS windows with Novell drivers while still having lots of memory, running lots of DOS windows, and so on...) but as soon as hardware continued to improve, that became moot.
Our organization used the Blackberry for many years before standardizing on the iPhone (gasp). I am the ONLY rebel in the 20k+ organization that has a company paid android. Not only do I deviate on the mobile phone, but on the mobile carrier. Everyone with company phones use Verizon and I use Sprint/T-Mobile.
Novell was awesome back in the day. I was a CNE and used to administer larg Novell networks back in the 3.12 days and even 4.10 days. I performed many large 3.12->4.10 migrations to Novell NDS back in the day. NDS was better b
Yes, but unfortunately Microsoft has been creating far too many "Wizards" th now make things more complicated on the more recent operating systems than t previous versions. It takes more clicks to just edit your IP address on Windows these days. They need a global "disable all wizards" toggle!
I will find a way to run everything on Linux if all the future modern OS are tied to the cloud. More than half the population only really need a browser so the Chrome OS is good enough for them.
I like my Iphone SE, 1st gen as I have no compelling reason to upgrade.
Wow thats impressive! I never caught on to Novell. I actually didn't
really get into serious networking stuff until Windows NT4 / 2000.
What absolutely kills me... makes me laugh... actually laugh from the belly... are Powershell fanatics. These are seriously people from another planet.
I've worked with PS, written some scripts with it and mannnnnn... the
syntax for the most basic of operation I found to be Rube Goldberg convoluted in design and execution.
They've completely missed the joke... that you're spending countless hours on
a command prompt of a "Windows" OS. Just like Windows Server installs without
the GUI. It completely goes against the whole point of a GUI, the whole name.
Same here, I'll be dragged kicking and screaming into installing Linux... actually I do like the BSD variants. NetBSD and FreeBSD. They just seem a bit more mature and meant for long-term stability.
One thing I'm still not comfortable with regarding web apps is that if your internet service goes down, you'll be unable to access/run those programs. I still like to have locally-installed software. Otherwise,
if software is all web-based (or otherwise runs from an internet
server), we wouldn't need much more than dumb terminals at home (whereas typically it's a good thing to have your own storage and processing
power at home).. In some ways, it seems like computing is coming full-circle.
Nightfox
I agree that powershell has a convoluted syntax that makes some of the 200 character command line options in Linux look basic. The execution of powershell is a mess.
I understand why Microsoft created this - all in the name of "automation and scripting". Why not use APIs, or any other straight forward method towards automation.
eCS and Arca OS both run fine on ESXi 6.7. I have never found an operating system that doesn't run in a virtual environment.
It's weird, the whole point of the "Personal Computer" was that we would get to own our computers, and run our own local software without having to worry about timeshare, or using someone elses system. It seems as if they are wanting to undo the whole "Personal Computer" thing and move us back to using other peoples machines which they control.
Software developers truly suck, for creating this terrible situation. Our
One thing I'm still not comfortable with regarding web apps is that
if your internet service goes down, you'll be unable to access/run
those programs. I still like to have locally-installed software.
I wrote a book using Google Docs, and even when I was without internet access, could still access the doc and make offline changes. I haven't tried that with Microsoft365 yet.
Re: Re: 2017/2018 PC to modernize it.
By: boraxman to Nightfox on Sun Nov 06 2022 09:55 pm
It's weird, the whole point of the "Personal Computer" was that we wo get to own our computers, and run our own local software without havi worry about timeshare, or using someone elses system. It seems as if are wanting to undo the whole "Personal Computer" thing and move us b to using other peoples machines which they control.
I've had basically the same thought. It's a weird situation.
Software developers truly suck, for creating this terrible situation.
I imagine it has more to do with them doing what their employer wants, rather than choosing themselves that this was a good idea. I'm a
software developer professionally, and it wouldn't be my first choice.
Nightfox
esc wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I wrote a book using Google Docs, and even when I was without internet access, could still access the doc and make offline changes. I haven't tried that with Microsoft365 yet.
You can't tease a book like that without sharing a link ;)
Warpslide wrote to Weatherman <=-
Groupwise! There's a name I haven't thought about in awhile. I worked
at a place that was still running Groupwise when I started there in
2009. I dragged them away from that to Exchange (and later Office
365).
Atreyu wrote to Weatherman <=-
Wow thats impressive! I never caught on to Novell. I actually didn't really get into serious networking stuff until Windows NT4 / 2000.
Weatherman wrote to Atreyu <=-
past 3 years is adding a technology called OTV (overlay transport virtualization). Fancy term for a VPN on steroids. It allows you to
run the same VLANs/networks at the same time in two data centers on
routed network links. You can even route the same networks on both
sides at the same time. Perfect for HA in VMware.
I'm dating myself - I worked at a mac/windows shop in the early '90s, and my boss had a plan to replace a mac-based email system called QuickMail with WordPerfect Office, an earlier version of Groupwise. It took so long to try and customize it for what we were going to use that people got tired of waiting, and we set up a BSD box with Qpopper and bought copies of Eudora Pro for the office. Turns out that we didn't need groupware, just email - and Eudora/POP3 worked great.
I have the Eudora sound on my phone for new mail, still. :)
It was a post-apocalyptic novel I wrote during NANOWRIMO a few years
ago. I've been meaning to clean it up and publish it on Amazon for a while...
I completely agree. Keep the power at home. If you want a web app then
host it locally and access it across the internet. Nextcloud offers all
the goodies Google has and you can do it on a PI if you don't have a
server sitting around.
The one scripting language I actually didn't mind, was Rexx on OS/2.
AFAIK OS/2 v1.3 won't run that easily in a virtual environment,
because it was 'optimized' for a 286 processor.
Sounds like something we're doing at work with our SD-WAN and firewalls.
We were able to extend a subnet from one office to another during a
server migration. Pretty wild stuff, the last time I did networking as
part of my job networks were physically isolated.
Matthew Munson wrote to All <=-
Since Windows 11 does not accept my Ryzen 1700x, should I upgrade it to
a 3700x on my B350-Prime Plus motherboard (i flashed my bios for this)
and perhaps buy a 1tb ssd to upgrade my storage at the same time.
Exodus wrote to Gamgee <=-
Wipe that virus-laden "OS" off the computer, install Linux, and keep on moving forward. Cost = 0.
I love the version of Ubuntu that has ADS in the terminal window ....
that was classy for whoever did that.
Gamgee wrote to Nightfox <=-
Just a weak attempt at humor. I'm anti-Windows and sometimes can't
resist poking at it... ;-)
I don't remember that at all, but I am not big on Ubuntu in general. Still, what was your point?
It's weird, the whole point of the "Personal Computer" was that we would get to own our computers, and run our own local software without having
to worry about timeshare, or using someone elses system. It seems as if they are wanting to undo the whole "Personal Computer" thing and move us back to using other peoples machines which they control.
just keeps growing as everything connects to the network these days. It won't be long until my toilet will be able to count flushes per day and will be on my home LAN.
I remember hearing that before. Do you know if the ATMs are still using OS/2 or was that just back in the day?
You bring up a good point. Collaboration is much more complicated (to
me) under 365 than in G Suite. The office apps in Microsoft 365, both
the web apps and desktop apps feel much more functional than their G suite counterparts.
What?! Five extra flushes today! That will be 5 DOGE penalty per flush!
I think a large number are still using it. The multimedia ones are the
ones most likely using embedded Windows, but if they are still old school text interface most likely OS/2 still.
killer wrote to boraxman <=-
different. There will be another evolution and we will swing back the other way honestly. Just the simple fact that Internet access is not always around will force people to move away from the cloud eventually.
You know... I don't ever remember the Linux crowd ever going after
OS/2. There was this odd level of calm, a mutual respect between
the two.
Maybe because some of the Linux people once used OS/2...
That's at least my story.
I am likely just going to buy a 5600G processor to replace the 1700x.
Ha, and here I am running an AMD Phenom II. That CPU you're getting
rid of would run rings around my *main* rig. Kids these days with
their newfangled processor doohickeys!
Honestly there's aspects I like(d) about almost every OS I've ever used.
Used to work OS/2 support for iomega...
of course I remember very little, about the only thing I really
didn't like about OS/2 was that everything you wanted to do outside
run windows compat software was costly and that the configuration
file(s) were beyond massive.
Honestly there's aspects I like(d) about almost every OS I've ever used.
I get a kick out of trying old OSes to see if there are things I like. I'm particularly fond of AmigaOS. There are several things in AmigaOS that I enjoy that I haven't seen implemented elsewhere. It was truly before its time, considering all that was possible with it so long ago.
Yeah, in the mid-late 90s, I used to like trying different operating systems mainly for x86 PCs, since that's what I had. At one point, I had a multi-bo setup on my PC with Windows 9x, OS/2, and Linux. Now I think it's funny to think that was on a 4.5GB hard drive, which is small by today's standards..
I switched back and forth a lot in the late 90's, with Windows 2000 (not ME), I pretty much didn't look back... I'm running Linux for my personal
Yeah, in the mid-late 90s, I used to like trying different operating systems, mainly for x86 PCs, since that's what I had. At one point, I
had a multi-boot setup on my PC with Windows 9x, OS/2, and Linux. Now I think it's funny to think that was on a 4.5GB hard drive, which is small by today's standards..
Now I think it's funny to think that was on a 4.5GB hard drive,
which is small by today's standards..
Ha, that's nuts. Yeah. I remember back when having a 300mb spare HD was like...endless amounts of storage that I could never fathom of filling up.
Another interesting thing to think about here is RAM. It's amazing to think how much optimization was done to make things work with the amount of memory we had access to.
I thought a 20 megabyte hard drive for my Tandy was "big" at the time...
I would have never thought back then that I'd be sitting here now with well over 100TB, and gone from a 300 baud modem to 1Gbps fiber.
I thought a 20 megabyte hard drive for my Tandy was "big" at the time...
Ha! I'm not quite there yet but getting there!
First HD I had was with the 286 I got for the BBS, a 40Mb job. It seemed huge at the time, and being DOS 3.3 it was a 30 and 10Mb partition setup. Prior to this I'd only ever had 140k or 800k floppies.
Tracker1 wrote to boraxman <=-
I'm kind of the opposite end... I did hold on to my i7 4790K for about
5 years... currently running an r9 5950X, RTX 3080 (10gb), 128gb ram,
2tb samsung 980 pro (linux drive), and hoping to see an r9 7950X3D in
the spring, and will upgrade to that in march/april assuming it exists.
I thought a 20 megabyte hard drive for my Tandy was "big" at the time
First HD I had was with the 286 I got for the BBS, a 40Mb job. It seemed huge at the time, and being DOS 3.3 it was a 30 and 10Mb partition setup. Prior to this I'd only ever had 140k or 800k floppies.
Exactly the same for me, too. My first hard drive was when I bought my 286-12 system after selling all my Apple // stuff. It has 2MB of RAM (which was a ton back then), and my first hard drive which was a full height 40MB drive (Seagate).
Does that mean we can run AmigaOS with VirtualBox?
I'm trying to recall the specs of my earlier computers, it was either a
386 or perhaps a 486 dx system... made by a crowd now long gone in New Zealand.. I think they were called PC General..... then the next system
was by PC Direct.... New Zealand computer companies had such imaginative names heh :)
Atreyu wrote to Tracker1 <=-
I could set up a basic VPN and RDP into my system from anywhere, do
proper backups to a tape drive because it had Ntbackup built-in. These things were outrageously expensive for OS/2 or impossible, or just halfassed.
Weatherman wrote to Atreyu <=-
I would have never thought back then that I'd be sitting here now with well over 100TB, and gone from a 300 baud modem to 1Gbps fiber.
On 17 Nov 22 16:55:14, Tracker1 said the following to Acn:
I switched back and forth a lot in the late 90's, with Windows 2000
(not ME), I pretty much didn't look back... I'm running Linux for
my personal
I know I blabbed about this a few times but I was the exact same...
Windows 2000 just "sold" me on how good it was at the time.
I could set up a basic VPN and RDP into my system from anywhere, do
proper backups to a tape drive because it had Ntbackup built-in. These things were outrageously expensive for OS/2 or impossible, or just halfassed.
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
Speaking of which, I have (9) 14TB drives sitting on my desk next to me right now. Once I get that new array in place, it will take over a week to copy all the data.
do you run OS/2 or ArcaOS?
The first incarnation of realitycheckBBS had 2 30 mb drives and 2 mb of RAM. Hard to fathom that it did mostly what I'm doing now on a VM with 2 cores, 3 GB of RAM and 100 GB of disk. Of course it would fill up the
disk during a Fido mail run and crap itself, but what the heck...
I used to have to unpack Fido mail packets into separate directories per echomail area, with *.msg files for each message, then import those into the message base. Took up twice the amount of disk space for what I'd import.
Speaking of which, I have (9) 14TB drives sitting on my desk next tome We> right now. Once I get that new array in place, it will take over a week We> to copy all the data.
Now that is a lot of data :)
I know I blabbed about this a few times but I was the exact same...
Windows 2000 just "sold" me on how good it was at the time.
I could set up a basic VPN and RDP into my system from anywhere, do
proper backups to a tape drive because it had Ntbackup built-in.
These things were outrageously expensive for OS/2 or impossible, or
just halfassed.
I bought Famatech's remote administrator program when I was administering Windows NT4 and 2000 servers, and still use it to this day on the BBS.Ran recovery ops for a mid sized company for a while in the later 90s...
I still try to block out those days of swapping DDS and DLT tapes by hand.
:)
Weatherman wrote to Avon <=-
My plan is to eventually create a (10) drive RAID5 array of 14TB
drives + keep an extra as a on-hand spare. For now, I'll start
with the 98TB usable and keep one for spare, and buy more when I
see good pricing.
I should be able to remove all my 3TB drives and keep them for
spares for my other servers that still use them.
Once I get all this in place, I should have around 200TB of
running storage on the (3) servers, plus have plenty of spare
drives for swapping.
I am my own cloud storage provider. :)
Ran recovery ops for a mid sized company for a while in the later 90s... man even with a multi-tape changing backup system, it's still nasty
AF... I don't recall the tech, but figured out how to do snapshotting
(NT4 era) on the main storage server (EMC, iirc) and that was far easier 99% of the time than dealing with the often borked backups.
Got even better with Litestep, remember a pretty custom UI, that really just felt exactly how I wanted... using a lightly customized Ubuntu
Budgie setup currently. I remember Windows 2000 pretty fondly, didn't
play games on it... kept a dual boot of win98se for a long while to play games (until XP SP3, when I finally jumped to XP)... since then played
with Linux... Really like WSL2 in Win10+, but with Win11, just irritated
me a bit too much... Linux does most of what I need now, and I don't
game too much, so sticking to what works native or via steam is okay
with me.
Ran recovery ops for a mid sized company for a while in the later 90s...
man even with a multi-tape changing backup system, it's still nasty
AF... I don't recall the tech, but figured out how to do snapshotting
(NT4 era) on the main storage server (EMC, iirc) and that was far easier
99% of the time than dealing with the often borked backups.
What do you use all this storage space for? Is this a business thing,
or just for home use?
I can't stand the lack of taskbar-labels in Windows 11... and I refuse to install some buggy halfassed shareware crap to "fix it". I often have many windows open at once on a workstation with six monitors. Breaking the taskbar functionality was unacceptable.
I actually thought XP and Server 2003 were the "best" that M$ was ever to crank out. Everything beyond that just got to be eye-candy or trying to do
I agree that Windows XP and Server 2003 had the best interface. Windows 11 reminds me of Windows 8, where so many people hated the taskbar and menu tha loads of people ran a shareware program to fix it.
Weatherman wrote to Gamgee <=-
What do you use all this storage space for? Is this a business thing,
or just for home use?
It is for home use, but I do run several Internet based systems
for various thing. I also use it the very same way that Google
Photos works, for photo/video backups for our phones. I just
have an app on our phones that auto SFTPs new files in
photo/video directories to my server.
So I'm basically my own cloud. I also am a data hoarder, so I
download tons of content. Lots of old TV shows and things like
that.
Some of the storage is for disk backups of all my server VMs,
physical PCs, etc, too. And I keep 31 backups of each (one month
worth), just to be safe.
The backups use almost 24TB by itself. I also have weeks for of
DVR data for my security cameras. Video takes up lots of
storage.
Tracker1 wrote to Atreyu <=-
Got even better with Litestep, remember a pretty custom UI, that really just felt exactly how I wanted...
I still try to block out those days of swapping DDS and DLT tapes by hand.
In this household computers work for me and not the other way around. And nobody nags me to do anything. I hate being nagged. Windows 10 and 11
always nag about something. Worse than the exwife. OS updates in
particular. Theres ALWAYS some stupid OS update or Dot-net fiasco to the tune of 500mb~2gb worth of downloading. At least once or twice a month. Unacceptable.
And its 2022 and even with these lovely massive updates, the GUI is still horribly broken when you go to rename a file on an SMB share and something happens to the network connection; the entire explorer process crashes and any other related operations crash. No warning, no explanation, nothing,
not even an "unknown error" logged anywhere.
Linux is no better with some of this stuff... I just wish there was a
modern OS that would act like an OS, talk like an OS and stop looking cute or trying
to be my buddy. And doesn't need constant updates. Talks like a computer
and just runs my bloody programs.
Wow, very cool. Is the auto-SFTP app on the phone a custom/private
thing, or is it a publicly available app? I might be interested in
trying that.
Weatherman wrote to Gamgee <=-
Wow, very cool. Is the auto-SFTP app on the phone a custom/private
thing, or is it a publicly available app? I might be interested in
trying that.
Yes, it is called FolderSync (for android). I can sync folders
via SFTP from phones to directories on my server at home. No
need for Google photos or any other cloud system.
I would much rather control my own data, anyway.
I was a very early|07 |11W|09> |10adopter of that with WWIVTOSS (and
still use it today).|07 I was one of the diehards who was one of the
first few people to join othernets in other parts of the world. I had
like 10 othernets thanks to internet transport.
But I am glad technology is opening up to all of us.
Main reason I'm turned off games. Spending $000's to play the same type of games I've already played.
I got a switch for the kids instead. That will suffice.
But I suppose that's different from computer gaming. I mostly haven't bothered there, but spent lots on a computer because I wanted to be able to run demoscene productions (and hopefully eventually make some), and, well, that requires something that can play the latest games.
On the one hand, they're shutting off the ability to purchase anything more on the 3DS as of March 2023 or so, but on the other, at the end of life for a system is one of the nice times to buy.
Main reason I'm turned off games. Spending $000's to play the same t of games I've already played.
I got a switch for the kids instead. That will suffice.
I picked up a 3DS recently, and then won a fairly-inexpensive auction
for a bunch of games for the system.
On the one hand, they're shutting off the ability to purchase anything more on the 3DS as of March 2023 or so, but on the other, at the end of life for a system is one of the nice times to buy.
But hard to find other people who actively play it.
But I suppose that's different from computer gaming. I mostly haven't bothered there, but spent lots on a computer because I wanted to be able to run demoscene productions (and hopefully eventually make some), and, well, that requires something that can play the latest games.
So I guess I still have the expensive habit, if for a different reason.
But I do think your approach is a very good one -- you should be able to enjoy the games just as much, but at a small fraction of the cost. Definitely a good idea.
The original XBox is one of my all time favorite consoles, and
enthusiasts have resurrected the xboxlive store (or whatever it is) in a community supported way. It's super cool and my description here is
pretty reductive to the reality but perhaps there will be some community effort for the 3DS at some point. I agree the 3DS is an amazing gaming platform, and there are /so/ many classic games for it which are all
just phenomenal.
I'm the only one who really is "into gaming", and even then, it is not that much. Part of the reason I stopped (apart from getting older,
having a family, etc), is that I don't really want to use Windows as I consider Microsoft pretty evil. Linux runs most of what I'm interested in, Wine/Proton fills the gaps.
However, the Demoscene is something else and to be honest, its something I've wanted to get back into, though I've never made demos, only enjoyed watching them.
Im thinking about buying 100 bucks of 3ds games before the shut down. I might write a buyers guide.
I hope you're right, though I also wonder how much Nintendo would allow such things to happen.
But nice to know there are lots of phenomenal 3DS games.
The great thing about the DS/DS-Lite was that multiple people with a console could wirelessly tether to one another, and oftentimes only one person needed to have a cart for everyone else to play live. We used to play Mario Kart all the time...it was an awesome way to pass the time,
for sure.
E.g., a lot of people code for older systems, or make something using Pico-8. Which, while it's not old, certainly feels like it could be.
But I've wanted to play around with newer things. And, well, be able to use Unreal Engine, even if I wouldn't necessarily only use it.
I do prefer the older hardware. IT seems more interesting, because its not as opaque. The new iPhone doesn't interest me because its so hard
to get to the underlying hardware. The original IBM PC? Now that is interesting because I can control every aspect of that machine.
boraxman wrote to Adept <=-
The original IBM PC? Now that is
interesting because I can control every aspect of that machine.
The original IBM PC? Now that is
interesting because I can control every aspect of that machine.
True. I started with a Commodore 64, but it wasn't until I got a PC-XT clone that things really got interesting. There were virtually *no*
ports on the motherboard, everything was done with add-on cards. So,
you could incrementally upgrade it easily. I started with replacing the 8088 CPU with a V20, getting a math co-processor for my CS classwork, upgrading the hard drive and controller to RLL to get more space, then replacing the motherboard with an AT/287, inheriting a card that added memory to the system along with more I/O... by the time I was done the only things left original were the power supply and the case.
I don't mind windows 11, it's much nicer than windows 10, but the hardware requirements suck.
The one thing I absolutely hated about Win11 was the right-click flyout menu in file explorer. Burying all the useful options in submenus requiring more clicking around was pretty lame.
(I'm behind on messages, so perhaps this already got talked about)
What I'm struggling with, with Win11, along with what you're saying, are
But, in general, Win11 seems fine to me. I can't say I particularly
_care_ about how it's different from Win10, but largely it does what I want, and I can ignore it most of the time.
And that's the state I want for an OS. Basically stop thinking about it.
I haven't used Win 11 as yet but my hunch is I may ride it out until the next OS version is released then try to move to that.. but time will
tell I guess.
Pondering chocolate is far more fun :)
Adept wrote to Avon <=-
So it seems reasonable to me for people to skip the version. I'm really only running it because I got new computers this year, and it seemed
more reasonable to have systems that were running Win 11 immediately.
I've gotten a variety of chocolate, and will eat some while typing this message, though I think the interesting food item I've been doing is my wine and gin advent calendars.
Windows 10 runs fine here, and Windows 11 won't run because this system doesn't have a TPM chip. It's a home model, I'm guessing lots of people will be unable to upgrade, and in 2025 they'll have to push the EOL
date out further.
They should just make a better operating system. Maybe it was a
conspiracy to drive new hardware sales. I might have to upgrade my
desktop to have a PCI 4.0 bus at the minimum.
So it seems reasonable to me for people to skip the version. I'm really only running it because I got new computers this year, and it seemed
more reasonable to have systems that were running Win 11 immediately.
Pondering chocolate is far more fun :)
It _is_.
I've gotten a variety of chocolate, and will eat some while typing this message, though I think the interesting food item I've been doing is my wine and gin advent calendars.
It's neat to try a couple new things each day, write down a short
review, take some pictures, etc.
Eventually I'll get the info into my wine wiki, which, while it's more work than I'd like, is a part of the fun of trying out various alcohols.
Now that computers are front-ends for
the internet, there don't appear to be many interesting differentiators. I
I struggle to figure out the killer feature Windows is bringing to the table nowadays in most use cases.
yeah I expect I'll need to move some systems across to Win 10 or 11 sooner than later... but while the lights keep blinkty blinking I'm happy - heh.
I don't think I necessarily agree with that, nor do I think computers should just be front-ends for the internet. Not everything is well
suited to run as a web/internet based app. Photo and video processing, software development, and other number-crunching tasks lend themselves
to having a powerful computer at home that you can use for those kinds
of things. Video games is another example.
Sometimes it seems like some software companies want us to use web apps though, as they can easily charge a subscription fee. In some ways it seems like a step backwards - I remember hearing about people using dumb terminals connected to powerful central mainframe computers in the 60s
and 70s.. As computers became smaller, more affordable, and more powerful, it became much easier to have a fairly powerful computer at
home that could run software locally, and generally that was seen as a good thing.
Yeah, I'm not sure any particular computer OS has any killer feature
these days. As you said though, Windows just being a known thing means that pretty much all types of software are made for Windows
(particularly gaming).
I've seen certain programs that some people just seem to love which are only made for one platform (i.e. Mac-only versions of certain programs), but I don't think there's any limiting factor where it would really need to be platform-specific.
Oddly, I've noticed that a large percentage of people who do photo &
video editing and making music (content creators) still seem to prefer Mac, and a lot of web developers seem to like working on a Mac too.
I've heard that music software for Mac in general tends to "just work"
and have low latency, but (in my limited experience) I haven't seen much problem with latency with Windows music software either.. The web devleopment connection with Mac is one thing I don't quite understand though.
affordable, and more powerful, it became much easier to have a
fairly powerful computer at home that could run software locally,
and generally that was seen as a good thing.
This is true, but it's also much easier to maintain. Build a web app, and then anyone with a browser can basically use it. You don't need to deal with customers downloading and installing things, really you can just offload all that burden onto the web browser itself. At the end of the day it lowers the burden significantly for development.
I'm not doing dev work for my job or BBS stuff or gaming, I tend to use my iPad. It's just easier and gets out of the way.
Agree, however I am sympathetic to game companies refusing to release for linux...it's a pain in the ass building something closed source and trying to support linux as a platform for your software, due to the bespoke nature of what 'linux' means for basically every type of user.
I prefer doing web dev on a Mac, I also prefer photo editing and making music on a Mac. Doing any kind of dev work in Windows has always been a bit of a nightmare for me. I use a Mac for doing dev stuff at work, but it's also an amazing personal computer. I prefer it infinitely over Windows.
Web development has its own issues though. You have to test it in multiple web browsers (and perhaps multiple versions of multiple web browsers). And for years, IE was the bane of web development as it had its own bugs and special cases you had to allow for. It seems like a
lot of hassle to have to test for multiple browsers & such.
What do you mean by "gets out of the way"?
That's true - though I think gaming support is one of the things Linux users have been wanting most. I think it's good that a big gaming
company like Steam has been supporting Linux for a little while now.
I'm curious how web development was a nightmare on Windows?
The development work I've done is more often back-end, desktop software (usually C# these days, but sometimes C++), and some mobile. I've done a little bit of web development and usually I use Windows and can't say
I've encountered any significant problems doing it.
I'm curious how web development was a nightmare on Windows?
My "dev on windows" experience historically has involved installing some 3rd party bash type thing, building a dev environment, wiring it up to work in the bash (git bash or something else), keeping everything in that environment up to date...whereas now WSL does make things a bit easier but man, that thing is a serious resource hog, and I can't traverse the filesystem well from the Windows side (or vice versa)...it's really just an annoyance and things have been much more straightforward for me to just launch my Mac and do a 'brew update' and am ready to go.
I struggle to figure out the killer feature Windows is bringing to the table core remaining major use cases:
- Gaming (linux is coming along but is still a ways off and may never catch
Ooo... sounds good. For me the challenge would be not scoffing it all before I formed a good review/view else it would all just be "yum"
I am not sure, but I suspect you could use Microsoft's Game Pass games on Linux. At least I have heard talk in that regard. If you have a proper Internet connection you can play lots of cloud games (in theory). I
don't care for modern games but if this is so then the platform is a
stepm closer to being irrelevant.
Though I _did_ put it in my wine wiki at some point, figuring that it'd
be interesting to also add the various fancy chocolates I came across.
Though I _did_ put it in my wine wiki at some point, figuring that it be interesting to also add the various fancy chocolates I came across
You have a wine wiki??? Care to share? :)
esc wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
I struggle to figure out the killer feature Windows is bringing to the table nowadays in most use cases. Now that computers are front-ends for the internet, there don't appear to be many interesting
differentiators.
esc wrote to Utopian Galt <=-
You know, this reminds me...I actually for the most part use middle of
the road hardware for my daily computing needs, throw linux on it, call
it a day...but I spend a small fortune building vintage DOS and Windows
98 machines lol. Those were the real days of meaningful innovation...
Consider that the iPad has democratized computing for groups of people that have never even owned a computer, similarly the iPhone and other smartphones. And these things don't even come with an instruction
manual. /That/ is what I mean about it staying out of the way.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/11 (Linux/64)
* Origin: m O N T E R E Y b B S . c O M (21:4/173)
Anyway, http://www.monoceroses.com/wine if you wanted to look.
Momentum, mostly. You mentioned Office support; I don't think it'll be
too long before Office is web-first. It exchanges their golden goose (purchasing office app licenses) for a recurring revenue model with a wider market base. Not a bad choice, looking forward.
I know people at work that use the web apps almost exclusively, even though they have the Office suite installed on their laptops.
I've sworn, every time I make a system change, that it'll be the time
that I install Linux on my desktop -- but I'm still running Windows, albeit 10 only. We'll see what I do if this PC lasts longer than
Windows 10 support.
As much as I'd love to hear the solid, satisfying KLIKK! of an AT power supply, I might be more tempted to get a thin client and throw DOS on them, They're cheap, they use modern peripherals, and my understanding
is that there's DOS support for most of the cheap network cards with packet drivers.
I think if I went retro, I'd get an old SUN box.
The iPad is an amazing tool. I use it to do research; I
can load up a ton of papers on the thing, and use tools
like Notability, LiquidText, and OmniGraffle to annotate,
take notes, design things, etc. It's probably the closest
I've seen to Engelbart's vision being realized.
If you like roguelikes, you may find my roguelike server amusing. I have only three
games in it so far but it is serviceable.
Very cool! mediawiki for content like this is perfect. I look forward to reading.
If you like roguelikes, you may find my roguelike server amusing. I have
only three
games in it so far but it is serviceable.
Ah super cool! I have a lot of roguelikes running as doors on my BBS. I /wish/ I could run Brogue but
gned game, speaking to the visuals.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/11 (Linux/64)
* Origin: m O N T E R E Y b B S . c O M (21:4/173)
esc wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
My current employer uses Google suite for everything and honestly doing all Office type stuff in a browser is simpler in many ways. I wish the drive integration was stronger but it all works, which is good. And the multitude of MS Office features that differentiate it from GSuite are
not very useful IMO...
godsend for me at this point in my career (I spent time in the military watching people agonize over silly slide details, it's nice to avoid this).
I know people at work that use the web apps almost exclusively, even though they have the Office suite installed on their laptops.
I actually pay for Office for my own purposes (O365 I think) and have written wrappers to make it so that I can treat MS Office applications like fully integrated desktop apps in my linux desktop. Double clicking
a Word doc will open in a standalone wrapped web Word app :)
I've sworn, every time I make a system change, that it'll be the time
that I install Linux on my desktop -- but I'm still running Windows, albeit 10 only. We'll see what I do if this PC lasts longer than
Windows 10 support.
I upgraded from Win10 to Win11 and tried very hard to like it, but
really just kept getting frustrated. I wound up blowing everything away and starting from scratch once again with linux and haven't looked
back. I just prefer the level of control I get to exert here.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/11 (Linux/64)
* Origin: m O N T E R E Y b B S . c O M (21:4/173)
esc wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
On the one hand I agree with you but on the other hand, having hardware Voodoo cards, hardware GUS cards, hardware MT32 (and other midi
devices), etc., with a real CRT VGA monitor, is an entirely different experience.
I /don't/ claim that it's worth the expense. But man, it's fun, and hobbies by nature aren't typically smart financial decisions. :)
I think if I went retro, I'd get an old SUN box.
We used Sun boxes at the government for a bit and I never really understood why some people are interested. What would an old SUN box do for you? Serious question?
It's like the nextcubes and stuff, they're so expensive, and I don't
even know what they would bring to the table. I would love to better understand this.
I have thought of setting an actual BBS with Roguelike DOors, but in the end of the day I find
dgamelaunch better if you just want to host terminal games. Besides, dgamelaunch is easy to adapt to
OpenBSD and its sandboxing models.
With a large company and a team that can help integrate them, Teams, Sharepoint and OneDrive are pretty powerful. There's a new feature
called Loop where you can share office content collaboratively in
Teams, in Outlook, and OneDrive/Sharepoint.
It'd be like being able to copy and paste a table into an email and
Teams, but have the recipient be able to edit it on the fly and update everywhere.
Sharepoint is the one thing lacking in GSuite - a way to create intranet sites. Teams sharing is starting to overtake Sharepoint now, to the
point where we're running out of space for it!
For smaller groups, G Suite rocks for simplicity. At home, I find myself going to docs.new and sheets.new rather than opening Word or Excel.
Oh, I wholeheartedly agree. I worked in a game company back in the '90s, and we were all in on hardware. Luckily, the company paid for hardware and game playing was encouraged. :)
Nostalgia. The hardware is beautiful to me, the SUN type 5 keyboard is
one of the best ever made, and my first *nix gig was supporting SUN hardware in my server room. I had a Sparc II at my desk at the time
with a huge (at the time) 19" monitor. While Windows and Mac were
barely multitasking, Solaris was able to run most of my infrastructure
on a couple of boxes.
I think if I went retro, I'd get an old SUN box.
We used Sun boxes at the government for a bit and I never really understood why some people are interested. What would an old SUN box do for you? Serious question?
It's like the nextcubes and stuff, they're so expensive, and I don't
even know what they would bring to the table. I would love to better understand this.
I think if I went retro, I'd get an old SUN box.
We used Sun boxes at the government for a bit and I never really understood why some people are interested. What would an old SUN box for you? Serious question?
Nostalgia. The hardware is beautiful to me, the SUN type 5 keyboard is
one of the best ever made, and my first *nix gig was supporting SUN hardware in my server room. I had a Sparc II at my desk at the time
with a huge (at the time) 19" monitor. While Windows and Mac were
barely multitasking, Solaris was able to run most of my infrastructure
on a couple of boxes.
It's like the nextcubes and stuff, they're so expensive, and I don't even know what they would bring to the table. I would love to better understand this.
The NeXT (hope I got the capitalization right) had display postscript
when everyone else had jaggedy screen letters, keyboards and mice that felt luxurious by comparison to the cheap PC keyboards of the time, and tools to create apps quickly, if memory serves.
I have thought of setting an actual BBS with Roguelike DOors, but in th end of the day I find
dgamelaunch better if you just want to host terminal games. Besides, dgamelaunch is easy to adapt to
OpenBSD and its sandboxing models.
I'd love to learn more about how each of these games is able to share things
I mean, I think this is technically fine, but I would love to find better ne
Brogue would be so great if only there was an 80x25 mode I could use. Alas.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 2022/07/11 (Linux/64)
* Origin: m O N T E R E Y b B S . c O M (21:4/173)
being something called "Universal Print". This moves your print server to the cloud and also lets you set permissions for your various
locations as to who can print where, all kind of neat.
Until you realize that if you loose internet access, you can't print.
You could be sitting right next to a printer, on the same network, but
if your location loses internet access, no printing for you.
esc wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Oh, I wholeheartedly agree. I worked in a game company back in the '90s, and we were all in on hardware. Luckily, the company paid for hardware and game playing was encouraged. :)
Nice! What company, if I may ask? I feel like we've discussed this
before but I'm drawing a blank hehe.
esc wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
With a large company and a team that can help integrate them, Teams, Sharepoint and OneDrive are pretty powerful. There's a new feature
called Loop where you can share office content collaboratively in
Teams, in Outlook, and OneDrive/Sharepoint.
Perhaps, yeah. My biggest company had 2000 people at its peak. My
current one is tipping the scales at under 400 :)
For smaller groups, G Suite rocks for simplicity. At home, I find myself going to docs.new and sheets.new rather than opening Word or Excel.
Funny, we are basically at opposite ends on tihs one :) I use gsuite
for work and MS for private purposes.
tenser wrote to esc <=-
A PC with a Pentium
was only half as good as a SPARCstation or SGI, but a quarter
of the cost, and the trend line was heading towards favoring the
PC within a decade.
tenser wrote to esc <=-
A PC with a Pentium
was only half as good as a SPARCstation or SGI, but a quarter
of the cost, and the trend line was heading towards favoring the
PC within a decade.
In 1999, I ran the web site for a company that used a Sun Enterprise 250 for Oracle and an Ultra 2 for the web front-end running Tomcat. When we expanded the site, I bought several 1u intel boxes and threw Linux on them, and they ran the web site. I'm pretty sure they cost less than another Ultra 2. That was the tipping point for me.
Eidos Interactive. The company that did Tomb Raider, Deus Ex, Daikatana, Final Fantasy 7, Hitman and Thief.
As much as I'd love to hear the solid, satisfying KLIKK! of an AT pow supply, I might be more tempted to get a thin client and throw DOS on them, They're cheap, they use modern peripherals, and my understandi is that there's DOS support for most of the cheap network cards with packet drivers.
On the one hand I agree with you but on the other hand, having hardware Voodoo cards, hardware GUS cards, hardware MT32 (and other midi
devices), etc., with a real CRT VGA monitor, is an entirely different experience.
I /don't/ claim that it's worth the expense. But man, it's fun, and hobbies by nature aren't typically smart financial decisions. :)
On 07 Dec 2022 at 01:19p, Adept pondered and said...
(I'm behind on messages, so perhaps this already got talked about)
If it helps I am too :)
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 88 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 00:06:14 |
Calls: | 4,921 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 8,491 |
Messages: | 351,023 |