Is the DeepSeek hype justified?

Date:
Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:22:06 +0000

Description:
The markets reaction to the latest news surrounding DeepSeek is nothing short of an overcorrection.

FULL STORY ======================================================================

The markets reaction to the latest news surrounding DeepSeek is nothing short of an overcorrection. While the enthusiasm around breakthroughs in AI often drives headlines and market speculation, this feels like yet another case
where excitement has outpaced evidence. Investors should be cautious about blindly jumping on the hype train without asking the tough questions.

Skepticism Around DeepSeeks Claims

DeepSeeks assertions about its advancements have drawn significant attention, but much of it remains unverified. For a technology that allegedly leapfrogs existing capabilities, the specifics around its breakthroughs are
conspicuously lacking. Transparency has always been a cornerstone for evaluating cutting-edge technologies, and until DeepSeek provides more
concrete evidence, skepticism is not just warrantedits necessary.

Chips on the Table: Do They Have More Than We Think?

One of the most puzzling aspects of the DeepSeek story is the apparent discrepancy between the resources they claim to have and those they might actually possess. Analysts are increasingly suspicious that DeepSeek may have access to far more hardwareparticularly high-performance chipsthan has been publicly disclosed. If true, this could have significant implications for
their capacity to train and deploy their models at scale, raising questions about how theyve managed to secure such resources.

The Training Puzzle: Costs and Methodology

Another critical angle here is the cost and methodology behind training their purportedly groundbreaking model. Training large language models (LLMs) is notoriously expensive and resource-intensive, often running into tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. How did DeepSeek manage to foot this bill, especially given their previously disclosed financials? Additionally, theres
an elephant in the room: Did they rely on other LLMs during training? This would raise ethical and competitive concerns, as it has long been recognized
as a controversial practice in the AI community. Leveraging other providers models for trainingpotentially without permissiondistorts fair competition
and undermines trust in the ecosystem.

Overreaction vs. Reality

The broader market response underscores the dangers of overreaction. While innovation in AI tools is undeniably exciting, weve seen time and again how unverified claims can lead to speculative bubbles. For investors, this is a moment to pause, ask questions, and demand clarity before assigning sky-high valuations to unproven technologies.

In summary, while Deepseeks story is intriguing, its imperative to separate fact from speculation. The market needs to temper its enthusiasm and demand more transparency before awarding DeepSeek the crown of AI innovation. Until then, skepticism remains a healthy and necessary stance.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro's Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry
today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not
necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro

======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/is-the-deepseek-hype-justified

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)