In the USA, if a voter MOVES they are REQUIRED to re-register because th are likely no longer in the same district, and especially if they move out-of-state. If they do not re-register, it is not the government's fa but their own fault for not following directions.
That is all well and good.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much of anything being removed.
I don't know. Is this enough to appease the leftist gods? They might want you to take these false claims to the next level.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much of
anything being removed.
Tell us their names.
However what is happening is folks who have not moved or changed much o >> anything being removed.
Tell us their names.
You want me to tell you their names!?
I'll tell you one. Daniel Moss. His place on the voter roll was
challenged as ineligible by a group called free the vote.
His name and thousands of others.
Do a little reaserch, would ya?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKFALtjiS_8&t=27s
There's a good reason why you can only tell me 1 name,
and that's because this ridiculous CNN "report" only tells 1 name. You're falling for BS. BS is slippery when it's fresh, but by the end of the day it dries up and no longer poses a slip hazard.
There are times when videos show evidence of things, but this video shows no evidence of anything. If you were a court judge, there would be major protests outside your courtroom on a daily basis. They'd call you "Judge BS."
Trump would/will do that regardless of project 2025.
That was my logic. Yours was "if Trump does a mass deporation, it is a sign he is following Project 2025."
Trump would/will implement much of project 2025 as well.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
I think it's safe to stop there.
That is a lie. California and New York both have successful econimies.
I think it's safe to stop there.
No they don.... Both are failing... Both have people moving out of the state..
Recently Elon moved all his California holding out of California to Texas...
Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about regulations and high taxes...
and poop on the street.... Ohhhh and Silvester Stallone... among many others are moving out as well.
There are more people leaving California and moving in... The wealth is leaving.
The same is happening in New York. Major financial firms are bugging out and moving to Texas, as did Elon, where there is no state income tax.
I think it's safe to stop there.
Don't tell me what to do...
Recently Elon moved all his California holding out of California to
Texas...
That is likely for "regulation reasons". Regulations are a good thing
when they are about best practices. If companies would keep up best practises without regulations than regulations would not be needed.
I wish those MAGA idiots would sometime learn about factchecking.
People move for various reasons. That doesn't mean the state has failed.
Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about regulations and high taxes...
Regulations and taxes are not reason to complain.
Foot Locker Flees New York's Crushing Taxes, Relocates Headquarters to Business-Friendly Florida
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not just any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulatory burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
I forget get what city it is... one of these 3 in Texas... Austin, Dalis or Huston... filed this year to be a financial HUB for the south. Seems that a lot of major banks and trading firms are moving to Texas... Not just for any reason... They are citing Taxes and high Regulations.
You sit in an other country on the other side of the continent and you tell Aaron who actually lives in New York that doesn't know what he's talking about.
BTW, McDonalds is thinking of leaving Chicago... an other liberal Sh!t Hole... citing High Taxes, Regulations and Crime.
When these companies leave they take the taxes they once paid, in this case Illinois, and go to a more favorable place... Like Texas and Florida where there is no state income tax.
BTW, California was/is the 5th largest economy in the world. They once had tax revenue surpluses... now they have deficits in the 100s of billions.
Sometimes you just say the stupidest stuff... And you don't support your claim and you try to tell the people who are living in the failed state to ignore what they see and hear.
Chevron Oil is also moving from California. All complaining about
regulations and high taxes...
Regulations and taxes are not reason to complain.
They said they are leaving for those reasons...
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not ju any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulato burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
If I was running a business the bottom line would be a key point in my decision making and location.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
McDonalds is already a low quality outfit. I wouldn't go there at all if they didn't have regulations.
Several companies are leaving/left California and New York citing not ju >> > any reason... as you might imply.... But because of the Tax and Regulato >> > burden.Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
And it's why they move... The bottom line... it's better to do business anywhere other than Demicrat Sh!t Holes...
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told
him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
You did... Aaron lives in New York and sees the failing state first hand and you tell him it's not a failing state... but he lives there... and you don't.
Who cares the quality... The largest fast food restaurant in the world is moving it's HQ from Chicago and going to a more favorable state and with that they'll take with them... employees and tax revenue.
WTF does your argument have to do with anything. New York and California are hemorrhaging their Tax Base...
Silvester Stallone announced that he is moving to Florida citing Taxes,
crime and woke stuff...
I know people move for many reasons... but my god... FOCUS!!
Regulations are not burdensome and neither are books!
Regulations are not burdensome and neither are books!
Regulations are extremely burdensome....
costly and can cause excessive delays...
The Biden and Harris wanted to build charging stations for electric cars... spent BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars and built 4... Because the regulations required DEI, among other things... and that's all they got with the money the spent.
Trump reduces regulations to speedup the process of Making America Great Again.
You sit in an other country on the other side of the continent and you t Aaron who actually lives in New York that doesn't know what he's talking about.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
You did... Aaron lives in New York and sees the failing state first hand you tell him it's not a failing state... but he lives there... and you d
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he talking about.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told
him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
That's like me telling you that British Columbia is a terrible place where syringes litter the streets, nobody recycles, and everybody is high all the time.
That might be how the media describes it, but since I've never lived
there, I won't parrot what they say about it, and since we're all BBS buddies, I would take your word for it when you tell me stuff about it.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he talking about.
You did, but you said it in a nice way.
I never told Aaron that he didn't know what he is talking about. I told >> him New York was a successful state, because that is what it is.
That's like me telling you that British Columbia is a terrible place whe syringes litter the streets, nobody recycles, and everybody is high all time.
There are places like that, an area called the downtown eastside
resembles your description. Exteme poverty and drugs galore, I've seen
it myself.
That area covers 10 square blocks and does not represent British
Columbia.
Nope, I never did. I'm sure Aaron knows New York very well. I just said that New York was a successful state. I'm sure New York has it's issues
as well as California, BC and many places but it is not a failure.
That area covers 10 square blocks and does not represent British
Columbia.
I have to insist that the downtown east side of Vancouver is "highly successful." I've never been there, but I've been to a lot of websites.
Successful is a vague word. Successful recycling program? Yes. Successful snow plow service? Yes. Successful economy? No.
New York State has a debt of $55.9 billion dollars.
New York, California, and Hawaii (all leftie controlled states) have the highest state debt out of all of the 50 states. Successful at being in debt? Yes.
I wish those MAGA idiots would sometime learn about factchecking.
New York State has a debt of $55.9 billion dollars.
Most people also carry debt.
That doesn't strike me as a lot for a state with a GDP around 2
trillion. Or am I mistaken about that?
New York State has a debt of $55.9 billion dollars.
Most people also carry debt.
That doesn't strike me as a lot for a state with a GDP around 2
trillion. Or am I mistaken about that?
Are these debts out of control?
For instance, what do the $1.9T tax credits given to the
corporations and billionaires by the MAGA administration actually mean
to the (yearly average as reported by the IRS) 85M US taxpayers?
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
Democrats like converting shopping malls into welfare offices.
That doesn't strike me as a lot for a state with a GDP around 2
trillion. Or am I mistaken about that?
It's better than Hawaii's debt to GDP ratio by comparison, but how much better would it be if Democrats didn't push all the major brands out of the state?
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being sued for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
Are these debts out of control?
It is out of control. Not just in New York, but in every Democrat state.
Regulations are neseccary. In most cases they spell out best practises.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for
a reason.
What regulation requires DEI?
Trump has succeeded in making some Americans hate again.
Regulations are neseccary. In most cases they spell out best practises.
Over regulation is bad and stifles growth.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Regulations cost tones... Large corporations love them because smaller companies can't afford them...
Latest was DEI... how F#$king stupid is that...
U have to hire a 1 legged black hermaphrodite with pronouns to make sure you're represented.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for
a reason.
Regulations are the main reason... it takes 15 to 20 years to build a road sometime because they are worried about a frog or a snail.
I have a buddy who builds homes and he says that about 1/3 of the price of building a new home is based on regulations....
Do you have a clue what you're talking about??
What regulation requires DEI?
For Democrats its having to hire weird people, a lot of the times unfit or unqualified for the job... Trump redefined it to Deport Every Illegal...
Trump has succeeded in making some Americans hate again.
Nope... It's the left that hates... Go to a Trump rally... they dance and sing patriotic songs.
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
We? We, who? We, the brainwashed MAGA cult members? That I can
believe. But the 40M living under the poverty level would rather pay the ultra-rich than be able to spend the money on their local shops and servicemen? Hardly.
Jobs? 3M lost their jobs during #45. The only president in modern history who left office with fewer jobs. Yeah, it didn't work out well, did it?
How much do you pay in taxes, BTW?
Democrats like converting shopping malls into welfare offices.
Holy Smoke. Are you for real?
Oh, you forgot about all the satanic orgies where they eat babies and drink their blood. Maybe in the malls, then?
It's better than Hawaii's debt to GDP ratio by comparison, but how much better would it be if Democrats didn't push all the major brands out of state?
I don't think democrats are pushing people out. Some may choose to go elsewhere. That's fine.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being su for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
Since Kathy Hochul's rogue regime took over, now businesses are being su >> > for hundreds of millions of dollars just for breaking bank policies.
I couldn't find any info about this.
I'm referring to Trump's "civil fraud trial."
I'm aware of Trumps civil fraud trial and conviction. He'll be sentenced in a few weeks.
It wasn't about bank policy, Trump's actions were against state law.
What has that got to do with Kathy Hochul?
Banning books and deregulation are not solutions.
WTF does that have to do with what I said...
It is a deflection.
Delection? Banning books is all the rage today.
Regulations cost nothing and cause no delays.
Following regulations may add costs and/or delays but they are there for a >> reason.
Which means they cost something. Duh.
Lack of regulations also cost something. Duh.
The regulations don't cost anything. Doing things right might add costs. Doing things wrong will also add costs.
I have never seen any road take that long.
For Democrats its having to hire weird people, a lot of the times unfit unqualified for the job... Trump redefined it to Deport Every Illegal...
That is not DEI.
Delection? Banning books is all the rage today.
He wasn't talking about banning books. If you want to start a separate thread about that...
Just FYI, wanting the books in a childrens' school library to be age appropriate is not "banning books." Banning them means they cannot be legally found anywhere and I am not aware of anyone doing that. Please
post some links to enlighten us.
Go ahead and try to speak for millions of people who live in a country that you don't live in.
I'm beginning to realize that's typical leftie behavior.
Go ahead and try to speak for millions of people who live in a countr that you don't live in.
Typical projection. *YOU* were the one who pretended to speak for
other people.
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis, "we" means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
First of all, I'm not a leftie, I've always written with my right
hand.
Secondly, projection is the hallmark of the MAGA cult members, as decreed by their cult leader, the Orange Jesus.
Just FYI, wanting the books in a childrens' school library to be age appropriate is not "banning books." Banning them means they cannot be legally found anywhere and I am not aware of anyone doing that. Please post some links to enlighten us.
You haven't heard about the book bans? The info is out there, have a look.
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis, "we"
means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
Oh, I forgot. I was distracted by all that speaking for 40M people that you were doing.
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis,
means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
Oh, I forgot. I was distracted by all that speaking for 40M people th you were doing.
Ah yes, another infamous MAGA hallmark. Never answer a direct question. If you can't lie, deflect.
"Deflection is a defense mechanism characterized by redirecting a conversation away from a challenging topic or issue to something less emotionally charged."
Shall we give it another try?
Who are the "we" that you claim to represent?
Aaron Thomas -> Björn Felten skrev 2024-09-03 01:03:
Unless you are megalomaniacal enough to use pluralis majestatis, "
means more than you. So I asked you who *YOU* try to speak for.
Oh, I forgot. I was distracted by all that speaking for 40M people tha
you were doing.
Ah yes, another infamous MAGA hallmark. Never answer a direct
question. If you can't lie, deflect.
You haven't heard about the book bans? The info is out there, have a look.
Aside from some "third party" rubbish,
the only (not) bans I have heard about, or seen any information on, are groups trying to make sure that their kids' school libraries are age appropriate for their kids' age and not adults.
Now, I am aware of a leftist movement a few recent years back where they protested and protested and got some Dr. Seuss books effectively banned.
Is that what you are talking about?
* SLMR 2.1a * "My eyeballs nearly popped out!"
Book bans are indeed all the rage in some places today.
Book bans diminish the quality of education students have access to and restrict their exposure to important persepectives that form the fabric
of a culturaly pluralist society (like the United States).
Books are a form of media, and can be used as a mode of propagation. Books about mathematics, science, programming languages, punctuation, vocabulary, etc are safe enough to be shared with children, but it's books in the literature, history, and sociology categories that need to be reviewed by parents first, to make sure that the education system isn't trying to molest their brains.
Who are the "we" that you claim to represent?
I speak for myself and not for other people.
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
When I mention the 40M US people living under the poverty level, I
am the one pretending to be speaking of behalf of those people?
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
You haven't heard about the book bans? The info is out there, have a look.
Aside from some "third party" rubbish,
What third parties do you speak of?
the only (not) bans I have heard about, or seen any information on, are groups trying to make sure that their kids' school libraries are age appropriate for their kids' age and not adults.
Oh yeah, I'm on board. I don't think school libraries need to have porn on the
shelves.
Of course we both know that is not happening.
Book bans are indeed all the rage in some places today.
Now, I am aware of a leftist movement a few recent years back where they protested and protested and got some Dr. Seuss books effectively banned.
Is that what you are talking about?
Is Dr. Suess banned? No.
Six of Dr. Suess's lesser know works are no longer published because of racist
imagery.
Do you find that "leftist"?
A school system in the NE US even admitted as much. A parent attempted to read passages from a book from his elementary school aged kid's school library at a board of education meeting. The board cut him off stating
that "reading pornography" during a meeting was not allowed.
"Pornography" was their word, not the parent's.
Book bans are indeed all the rage in some places today.
Where in the USA are books being outright banned, where you cannot get a copy of said books anywhere anymore?
Do you find that "leftist"?
Leftist generally don't like it when you bring up China being a reason that certain forms of racism are tolerated while other, non-racist things get labeled "racist."
Ah yes, another infamous MAGA hallmark. Never answer a direct
question. If you can't lie, deflect.
"We the people" - of the United States.
This excludes you and that other piece of garbage from Canada as well.
For the non-believers there is always Canada and of course Sweden.
Who are the "we" that you claim to represent?
I speak for myself and not for other people.
We like having businesses and we like having jobs.
I don't see an I here, but I can see two we.
Don't you even understand how different this would look like if you said:
"I like having businesses and I like having jobs."
But no, it sounds much better if you pretend to be speaking for millionss of
other people, doesn't it?
When I mention the 40M US people living under the poverty level, I am the one pretending to be speaking of behalf of those people?
What if I hade mentioned the 41M living in Canada, would that have made me speaking for all the Canadians?
#MAGALogicFails
A school system in the NE US even admitted as much. A parent attempted to read passages from a book from his elementary school aged kid's school library at a board of education meeting. The board cut him off stating that "reading pornography" during a meeting was not allowed.
"Pornography" was their word, not the parent's.
That is not happening in Canada and I would be surprised if it is happening in
the US. If such material slipped through the cracks it can be removed.
If this was pointed out to a librarian it would be removed. Or am I wrong?
Leftist generally don't like it when you bring up China being a reason that certain forms of racism are tolerated while other, non-racist things get labeled "racist."
Bring up China as you need. China is a deeply racist country. China's racism i
a reality, not much to be done about it. I dunno, but I don't think China want
to talk about it, or much of anything at all.
I might just do that. One day."We the people" - of the United States.
This excludes you and that other piece of garbage from Canada as well.
For the non-believers there is always Canada and of course Sweden.
Come to Louisiana. Leave different.
Come to Louisiana. Leave different.I might just do that. One day.
If this was pointed out to a librarian it would be removed. Or am I wrong?
Im past, yes. In the current climate, it would depend on what it was. If
it is a book that depicts (with non-scientific illustrations) two young
boys sexually experimenting on each other, it very well might not be
removed.
If it is a boy and a girl then, yes, it probably will be.
Bring up China as you need. China is a deeply racist country. China's racismi
a reality, not much to be done about it. I dunno, but I don't think Chinawant
to talk about it, or much of anything at all.
I agree with your statements. That said, being as racist as they are, we should not allow them to dictate to us what is racist or not as they obviously don't have a clue.
If this was pointed out to a librarian it would be removed. Or am I wrong?
Im past, yes. In the current climate, it would depend on what it was. If it is a book that depicts (with non-scientific illustrations) two young boys sexually experimenting on each other, it very well might not be removed.
If it is a boy and a girl then, yes, it probably will be.
I don't think sexual experimentation of any kind is part of school curriculum and has no place in school library. Reporting such material to a librarian should be enough to remove the book from the school library.
I agree with your statements. That said, being as racist as they are, we should not allow them to dictate to us what is racist or not as they obviously don't have a clue.
Agreed. I wouldn't take China's word for anything, or let them dictate anythin
at all.
That's not to say I wouldn't talk to them and hope for better.. but..
well."We the people" - of the United States.
This excludes you and that other piece of garbage from Canada as
Sweden.For the non-believers there is always Canada and of course
Come to Louisiana. Leave different.
I might just do that. One day.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 98 |
Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
Uptime: | 03:54:51 |
Calls: | 6,420 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 8,469 |
D/L today: |
671 files (179M bytes) |
Messages: | 356,187 |