• error

    From Robert Wolfe@1:261/20 to All on Mon Jun 1 14:12:02 2026
    getting this error now when pxw connects to my fido upink:

    Binkp: receive error in Phase 6 err=10060

    Reported to Andrew and Santronics. Expecting an answer back from their
    AI.
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v10.0b40
    * Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
  • From Robert Wolfe@1:261/20 to All on Mon Jun 1 14:28:50 2026
    posting this here for comment..

    -----Original Message-----
    From: listadmin-winserver@winserver.com
    <listadmin-winserver@winserver.com> On Behalf Of wsa
    Sent: Monday, June 1, 2026 2:25 PM
    To: WINServer@winserver.com
    Subject: RE: [WINServer] Re: connection issue.

    Robert â?"

    Good data point, and it fits the pattern. Internet Rex is listed in the compatibility table as a confirmed working mailer with no known issues,
    so if IR completes the session cleanly where binkd (or whatever
    1:320/219 is running) times out, that narrows it considerably.

    The most likely explanation: the remote mailer is completing its side of
    the EOB exchange and then dropping the TCP connection without a proper
    FIN â?" just going silent. IR may handle that gracefully (detecting the
    silent close and moving on), while PX sits waiting for the close frame
    until the socket timeout fires. The result looks like a PX hang but the
    root cause is on the remote side.

    That said, it's worth checking whether PX could be more aggressive about recognizing a completed session and not waiting indefinitely after both
    EOBs are exchanged. If both sides have sent and received EOB and all
    files are accounted for, there's arguably no reason to wait on the
    socket â?" a short timeout or an explicit close-after-EOB path might be
    cleaner than relying on the remote to close first.

    **For the dev record:** if you can confirm the mailer at 1:320/219 and
    grab their session log for the same timestamp, that would be useful.
    Knowing whether this is specific to binkd-115 (which already has known
    quirks in the compat table) or a different mailer would help scope any
    fix.


    going to send this out with internet rex.

    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v10.0b40
    * Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
  • From Robert Wolfe@1:261/20 to All on Mon Jun 1 14:32:18 2026
    posting this here for comment.

    posting this here for comment..----Original Message-----
    From: listadmin-winserver@winserver.com
    <listadmin-winserver@winserver.com> On Behalf Of wsa
    Sent: Monday, June 1, 2026 2:25 PM
    To: WINServer@winserver.com
    Subject: RE: [WINServer] Re: connection issue.obert â?"ood data point,
    and it fits the pattern. Internet Rex is listed in the
    compatibility table as a confirmed working mailer with no known issues,
    so if IR completes the session cleanly where binkd (or whatever
    1:320/219 is running) times out, that narrows it considerably.he most
    likely explanation: the remote mailer is completing its side of
    the EOB exchange and then dropping the TCP connection without a proper
    FIN â?" just going silent. IR may handle that gracefully (detecting the
    silent close and moving on), while PX sits waiting for the close frame
    until the socket timeout fires. The result looks like a PX hang but the
    root cause is on the remote side.hat said, it's worth checking whether
    PX could be more aggressive about
    recognizing a completed session and not waiting indefinitely after both
    EOBs are exchanged. If both sides have sent and received EOB and all
    files are accounted for, there's arguably no reason to wait on the
    socket â?" a short timeout or an explicit close-after-EOB path might be cleaner than relying on the remote to close first.*For the dev
    record:** if you can confirm the mailer at 1:320/219 and
    grab their session log for the same timestamp, that would be useful.
    Knowing whether this is specific to binkd-115 (which already has known
    quirks in the compat table) or a different mailer would help scope any
    going to send this out with internet rex.

    ... I like your approach, now let's see your departure
    --- Wildcat! v10.0.500.1 (May 2 2026), Editor Mod v1.7
    * Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
  • From Nick Boel@1:154/10 to Robert Wolfe on Mon Jun 1 19:10:24 2026
    Hey Robert!

    On Mon, 01 Jun 2026 14:28:50 -0400, you wrote:

    Good data point, and it fits the pattern. Internet Rex is listed in the compatibility table as a confirmed working mailer with no known issues,
    so if IR completes the session cleanly where binkd (or whatever
    1:320/219 is running) times out, that narrows it considerably.

    FYI, wherever they got "Internet Rex is listed in the compatibility table as a confirmed working mailer with no known issues", they were given the wrong information.

    You can ask just about any mailer developer these days how they've had to work around IREX's bad binkp implementation. IIRC, it may have been something to do with stating it was binkp 1.1 compliant, when it really isn't. But, I am fairly certain it was something in the lines of how the session is ended, as seemed to be what was being discussed in whatever it was that I replied to. ;)

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20260425
    * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
  • From Robert Wolfe@1:261/20 to Nick Boel on Mon Jun 1 21:48:08 2026
    FYI, wherever they got "Internet Rex is listed in the compatibility table as
    confirmed working mailer with no known issues", they were given the wrong information.

    yeah probably from logs a couple us us irex users submitted on request
    that their ai analyzed.

    ... Give a man an inch, and he thinks he's a ruler.
    --- Wildcat! v10.0.500.1 (May 2 2026), Editor Mod v1.7
    * Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/106 to Nick Boel on Tue Jun 2 17:54:16 2026
    FYI, wherever they got "Internet Rex is listed in the compatibility table as a confirmed working mailer with no known issues", they were given the wrong information.

    You can ask just about any mailer developer these days how they've had to work around IREX's bad binkp implementation. IIRC, it may have been something to do with stating it was binkp 1.1 compliant, when it really isn't. But, I am fairly certain it was something in the lines of how the session is ended, as seemed to be what was being discussed in whatever it was that I replied to. ;)


    I suspect that its biggest problem is that IREX is old and no longer updated. If it is possible in the situation in question, I would suggest using binkd instead.


    --- ScorpioWeb v0.32a (Linux/x86_64)
    * Origin: Project Scorpio TEST (1:2320/106)
  • From Andrew Leary@1:320/219 to Nick Boel on Wed Jun 3 06:45:06 2026
    Hello Nick!

    01 Jun 26 19:10, you wrote to Robert Wolfe:

    FYI, wherever they got "Internet Rex is listed in the compatibility
    table as a confirmed working mailer with no known issues", they were
    given the wrong information.

    You can ask just about any mailer developer these days how they've had
    to work around IREX's bad binkp implementation. IIRC, it may have been something to do with stating it was binkp 1.1 compliant, when it
    really isn't. But, I am fairly certain it was something in the lines
    of how the session is ended, as seemed to be what was being discussed
    in whatever it was that I replied to. ;)

    As a developer who maintains a BinkP compatible mailer (mbcico), I can definitely confirm that IRex has multiple issues in this regard. In fact, when mbcico connects to IRex, it automatically falls back to binkp/1.0 to avoid most of the issues.

    Andrew

    ---
    * Origin: Phoenix BBS * phoenix.bnbbbs.net (1:320/219)
  • From Robert Wolfe@1:261/20 to Andrew Leary on Wed Jun 3 13:15:40 2026
    On 6/3/2026 6:45 AM, Andrew Leary wrote to Nick Boel:

    As a developer who maintains a BinkP compatible mailer (mbcico), I can definitely confirm that IRex has multiple issues in this regard. In fact, when mbcico connects to IRex, it automatically falls back to binkp/1.0 to avoid most of the issues.

    FYI, the current betas include a config file called binkp-compat.ini with this in it:

    ; -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    ; Internet Rex - VER: Internet Rex 2.31 Win32 (binkp/1.1)
    ; No longer actively maintained. Seen on Terry's hub (3:712 net).
    ; CRAM-MD5 behavior unknown. Conservative default maintained.
    ; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [internet rex]
    CramMD5=0

    ; -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    ; mbcico - VER: mbcico/1.1.7/Linux-x86_64 binkp/1.1
    ; Unix FTN mailer. CRAM-MD5 behavior unknown.
    ; Conservative default maintained.
    ; ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [mbcico]
    CramMD5=0


    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v10.0b40
    * Origin: Over The Brink * Grand Island, NY USA *| brinkbbs.org (1:261/20)