@MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
@CHRS: IBMPC 2
@TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
Hello All!
Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in the message header?
Regards,
Martin
--- timEd/Linux 1.31.g3+
* Origin: Bitz-Box - Bradford - UK (2:280/464.27)
SEEN-BY: 124/5016 153/757 154/10 203/0 221/0 280/464 5003 292/8125 301/1 SEEN-BY: 341/234 396/45 423/120 712/848 770/1 2452/250
@PATH: 280/464
@MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
@CHRS: IBMPC 2
@TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
Hello All!
Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in the
message header?
I don't see one...
@MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
@CHRS: IBMPC 2
@TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in
the message header?
I don't see one...
Thanks for the confirmation.
Anyone have a fix for this?
@MSGID: 2:280/464.27 25e8c160
@CHRS: IBMPC 2
@TID: CrashMail II/Linux 0.71
Am I correct in assuming that timEd doesn't insert a TZUTC kludge in
the message header?
I don't see one...
Thanks for the confirmation.
Anyone have a fix for this?
Use GoldED!? ;)
Anyone have a fix for this?
Use GoldED!? ;)
HaHaHa 8-))
According to what I've just read a few minutes ago in another echo, it seems that kludges are not actually required - Hmmmm.
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin | 
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA | 
| Users: | 104 | 
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) | 
| Uptime: | 14:47:35 | 
| Calls: | 7,086 | 
| Calls today: | 5 | 
| Files: | 9,223 | 
| D/L today: | 
  				108  				files  				 (9,404K bytes)  | 
  		
| Messages: | 374,059 |