Just a restatement of what I had asked in IRC:
10:55 < khelair> msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a preferred method of accessing
what the last_msg or last_read pointer might be for the mail
sub, is it?
11:07 < khelair> would I be correct in assuming that the Mail sub, in the
standard shell, utilizes the applicable message header
attributes to glean where the unread ones are at?
though I misphrased it pretty poorly at the beginning. What I meant to say was 'If msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a potential method of accessing the last_msg or last_read pointers, then would I be correct in assuming that the mail sub, in the standard shell, utilizes applicable message header attributes to clean where the unread ones are at?
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 126 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 492703:15:13 |
| Calls: | 7,918 |
| Files: | 9,413 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (410K bytes) |
| Messages: | 400,795 |