wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to All on Tue Mar 29 2011 04:56 pm
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Oh I bet Corey. Running PCB was a great bbs but a pain to write code for extra options similar to Virtual Advanced BBS.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
Re: PCBoard
By: The Millionaire to Corey on Tue Mar 29 2011 09:03 pm
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to All on Tue Mar 29 2011 04:56 pm
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Oh I bet Corey. Running PCB was a great bbs but a pain to write code for extra options similar to Virtual Advanced BBS.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
it looks like each programmer only had access to thier sections.
I do like the way all the important stuff is library calls thou.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to The Millionaire on Wed Mar 30 2011 12:49 am
Re: PCBoard
By: The Millionaire to Corey on Tue Mar 29 2011 09:03 pm
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to All on Tue Mar 29 2011 04:56 pm
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Oh I bet Corey. Running PCB was a great bbs but a pain to write code f extra options similar to Virtual Advanced BBS.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
it looks like each programmer only had access to thier sections.
I do like the way all the important stuff is library calls thou.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Could I get a copy of this off you by any chance? I collect bbs programs. Thanks.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
Re: PCBoard
By: The Millionaire to Corey on Wed Mar 30 2011 08:33 am
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to The Millionaire on Wed Mar 30 2011 12:49 am
Re: PCBoard
By: The Millionaire to Corey on Tue Mar 29 2011 09:03 pm
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to All on Tue Mar 29 2011 04:56 pm
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Oh I bet Corey. Running PCB was a great bbs but a pain to write cod extra options similar to Virtual Advanced BBS.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
it looks like each programmer only had access to thier sections.
I do like the way all the important stuff is library calls thou.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Could I get a copy of this off you by any chance? I collect bbs programs. Thanks.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
Which parts?
the bbs package or the source code?
and I would need a email address to send it too.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to The Millionaire on Wed Mar 30 2011 10:17 am
Re: PCBoard
By: The Millionaire to Corey on Wed Mar 30 2011 08:33 am
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to The Millionaire on Wed Mar 30 2011 12:49 am
Re: PCBoard
By: The Millionaire to Corey on Tue Mar 29 2011 09:03 pm
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to All on Tue Mar 29 2011 04:56 pm
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Oh I bet Corey. Running PCB was a great bbs but a pain to write extra options similar to Virtual Advanced BBS.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
it looks like each programmer only had access to thier sections.
I do like the way all the important stuff is library calls thou.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
Could I get a copy of this off you by any chance? I collect bbs progra Thanks.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
Which parts?
the bbs package or the source code?
and I would need a email address to send it too.
"Practise safe Lunch, Use a Condiment"
After we had talked, I went to a little research and found it at hte BBS Documentary. bbsdocumentary.com. Could have saved you some compilation in th long run.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
yeah but then you can't mod it as you like.
plus, the public source code out there needs a load of work to compile it.
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to The Millionaire on Wed Mar 30 2011 14:09:46
yeah but then you can't mod it as you like.
plus, the public source code out there needs a load of work to compile it
That reminds me of something I was thinking recently.. I heard that WWIV wa optionally sold with source code, as was Synchronet when licenses were being sold, and that was considered an advantage because sysops were able to modif the source to fit their own needs/desires for their BBS - but what were such sysops to do when new versions of the software were released? I imagine it would be a hassle to keep track of and merge their custom changes into new versions when they were released.
Nightfox
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to The Millionaire on Wed Mar 30 2011 14:09:46
yeah but then you can't mod it as you like.
plus, the public source code out there needs a load of work to compile it
That reminds me of something I was thinking recently.. I heard that WWIV wa optionally sold with source code, as was Synchronet when licenses were being sold, and that was considered an advantage because sysops were able to modif the source to fit their own needs/desires for their BBS - but what were such sysops to do when new versions of the software were released? I imagine it would be a hassle to keep track of and merge their custom changes into new versions when they were released.
Nightfox
That reminds me of something I was thinking recently.. I heard that WWIV was optionally sold with source code, as was Synchronet when licenses were being sold, and that was considered an advantage because sysops were ableDepends on how well the BBS was designed when originally coded. After a
to modify the source to fit their own needs/desires for their BBS - but
what were such sysops to do when new versions of the software were
released? I imagine it would be a hassle to keep track of and merge their custom changes into new versions when they were released.
Depends on how well the BBS was designed when originally coded. After a
couple of releases the sysop would eventually catch on to the way of
thinking....
Re: PCBoard
By: Nightfox to Corey on Wed Mar 30 2011 07:09 pm
That reminds me of something I was thinking recently.. I heard that WWIV was optionally sold with source code, as was Synchronet when licenses wer being sold, and that was considered an advantage because sysops were able to modify the source to fit their own needs/desires for their BBS - but what were such sysops to do when new versions of the software were released? I imagine it would be a hassle to keep track of and merge thei custom changes into new versions when they were released.Depends on how well the BBS was designed when originally coded. After a
couple of releases the sysop would eventually catch on to the way of
thinking.... Besides, a funny thing about having the source code. I'd
venture a lot of sysop's bought it thinking they'd make changes, then
once they got it found they either couldn't think of anything to change,
or couldn't make heads or tails out of making said changes.... Especially
depending on the style of the programmer and the language used... Most
type of deals like that would encrypt certain areas of the software in
hard to understand assembly that was meant to be hard to decode, such tha
if you tried to change the copyright, registration system, and certain
other areas, you had a task ahead of you. Unfortiantly, those certain ar
where often all the areas the sysop originally thought would be "easy" ;-
Could I get a copy of this off you by any chance? I collect bbs progra Thanks.
After we had talked, I went to a little research and found it at hte BBS Documentary. bbsdocumentary.com. Could have saved you some compilation in th long run.
There's a torrent floating around the Pirate Bay w/ quite a few DOS BBS programs:For the record, I did a quick copy without the period and it worked fine.
"http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6205414/A_collection_of_DOS-based_BBS_soft ware ."
Note the period at the end of the URL.
--- COREY wrote --
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok
what a job. source code was like a maze
--- DREAMER wrote --Excellent! Thanks!
There's a torrent floating around the Pirate Bay w/ quite a few DOS BB programs
"http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6205414/A_collection_of_DOS-based_BBS_sof
Re: PCBoard
By: Dreamer to The Millionaire on Wed Mar 30 2011 10:32 pm
There's a torrent floating around the Pirate Bay w/ quite a few DOS BBS programs:For the record, I did a quick copy without the period and it worked fine.
"http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6205414/A_collection_of_DOS-based_BBS_s ware ."
Note the period at the end of the URL.
Any idea on how many are in Pascal? I know overall, the majority of
BBS's where written in Pascal, a handfull in Basic and I think a few in
C. I'm downloading the torrent as we speak. I can't wait, it looks like
I'm going to win this auction for Borland Pascal 7.0. I found the patche
for making OS/2 executables, and the CRT unit patch (have 3-4 of them!)
Which is sort of another thing. I am thinking of getting OS/2 Warp.
Does anyone know if on Warp 4, I can use an eithernet and get internet
like on windows, or do you have to do the old dialup? All I remember was
back when I had OS/2, I had 2.1 w/ Dial-up (a version I bought on CD-ROM
somewhere else) and beta tested the Warp version, which I remember it com
with various internet stuff in it. I remember I used to use vmodem, whic
I'd love to find a similiar product that could be registered, but apparen
Ray Guinn vanished from the face of the earth. If I could just get Tenet
and FTP access from OS/2 to my BBS Server, I think I could convince mysel
to install OS/2 on this machine and use it for testing OS/2 software that
I Write as well as DOS software. The nice thing I love about OS/2 is I
could install several boot disk and boot from that DOS version while
inside of OS/2 and test my software to make sure it ran on every version
of DOS....
--- COREY wrote --
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok
what a job. source code was like a maze
Really? On what platform? I would love a copy of that, as I want to put
a PCboard theme into QBBS...
--- DREAMER wrote --
There's a torrent floating around the Pirate Bay w/ quite a few DOS BB programs
"http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6205414/A_collection_of_DOS-based_BBS_sof
--- DREAMER wrote --
There's a torrent floating around the Pirate Bay w/ quite a few DOS BB programs
"http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6205414/A_collection_of_DOS-based_BBS_sof
Hey, my old DOS BBS software is in there! Bitchen!
For the record, I did a quick copy without the period and it worked fine.
Any idea on how many are in Pascal? I know overall, the majority of
BBS's where written in Pascal, a handfull in Basic and I think a few in
C. I'm downloading the torrent as we speak. I can't wait, it looks like
I'm going to win this auction for Borland Pascal 7.0. I found the patche
for making OS/2 executables, and the CRT unit patch (have 3-4 of them!)
Which is sort of another thing. I am thinking of getting OS/2 Warp.
Does anyone know if on Warp 4, I can use an eithernet and get internet
like on windows, or do you have to do the old dialup? All I remember was
back when I had OS/2, I had 2.1 w/ Dial-up (a version I bought on CD-ROM
somewhere else) and beta tested the Warp version, which I remember it com
with various internet stuff in it. I remember I used to use vmodem, whic
I'd love to find a similiar product that could be registered, but apparen
Ray Guinn vanished from the face of the earth. If I could just get Tenet
and FTP access from OS/2 to my BBS Server, I think I could convince mysel
to install OS/2 on this machine and use it for testing OS/2 software that
I Write as well as DOS software. The nice thing I love about OS/2 is I
could install several boot disk and boot from that DOS version while
inside of OS/2 and test my software to make sure it ran on every version
of DOS....
--- DREAMER wrote --
There's a torrent floating around the Pirate Bay w/ quite a few DOS BB programs
"http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6205414/A_collection_of_DOS-based_BBS_sof
Excellent! Thanks!
--- DREAMER wrote --
There's a torrent floating around the Pirate Bay w/ quite a few DOS BB programs
"http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6205414/A_collection_of_DOS-based_BBS_sof
Hey, my old DOS BBS software is in there! Bitchen!
--- COREY wrote --
Watch out, I found 2 viruses when I got it
--- DREAMER wrote --
Which one
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to All on Tue Mar 29 2011 04:56 pm
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
Re: PCBoard
By: The Millionaire to Corey on Wed Mar 30 2011 08:33 am
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to All on Tue Mar 29 2011 04:56 pm
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
I'd like to get my hands on that as well. :)
g.
That reminds me of something I was thinking recently.. I heard that WWIV
was optionally sold with source code, as was Synchronet when licenses were >> being sold, and that was considered an advantage because sysops were able
to modify the source to fit their own needs/desires for their BBS - but
what were such sysops to do when new versions of the software were
released? I imagine it would be a hassle to keep track of and merge their >> custom changes into new versions when they were released.
Depends on how well the BBS was designed when originally coded. After a couple of releases the sysop would eventually catch on to the way of thinking....
Besides, a funny thing about having the source code. I'd
venture a lot of sysop's bought it thinking they'd make changes, then
once they got it found they either couldn't think of anything to change,
or couldn't make heads or tails out of making said changes....
Ray Guinn vanished from the face of the earth. If I could just get Tenet
and FTP access from OS/2 to my BBS Server, I think I could convince myself
to install OS/2 on this machine and use it for testing OS/2 software that
I Write as well as DOS software. The nice thing I love about OS/2 is I
could install several boot disk and boot from that DOS version while
inside of OS/2 and test my software to make sure it ran on every version
of DOS....
I remember without source having to hex edit RENEGADE.OVR for each release in order to put a few mods in place... that was fun. At one point I had a list of every string I had to search for and what to replace it with when development was really active on it.That, or write a program to do it for you.... Much like when it was popular to make self modifying EXE's and such.... We used to have something like:
.... but what were such sysops to do when new versions of the software were released? I imagine it would be a hassle to keep track of and merge their custom changes into new versions when they were released.
--- TRACKER1 wrote --
I'd suggest looking into VirtualBox, VMWare, Parallels or Virtual PC. All which should allow you to handle a virtual instance of said software with virtual audio and network hardware that's pretty well supported, far more easily than trying to get native hardware working
Virtual PC is horrible.
--- TRACKER1 wrote --
I'd suggest looking into VirtualBox, VMWare, Parallels or Virtual PC. All which should allow you to handle a virtual instance of said software with virtual audio and network hardware that's pretty well supported, far more easily than trying to get native hardware working
VirtualBox for the win. VB is free, and easilly as good as Parallels.
Virtual PC is horrible.
I'd suggest looking into VirtualBox, VMWare, Parallels or Virtual PC. All >> which should allow you to handle a virtual instance of said software with
virtual audio and network hardware that's pretty well supported, far more
easily than trying to get native hardware working
VirtualBox for the win. VB is free, and easilly as good as Parallels.
Virtual PC is horrible.
Virtual PC is horrible.
Perhaps because Microsoft bought it some years ago and started messing with it.. Virtual PC used to be made by Connectix, and I could be thinking of another VM software package, but I thought Virtual PC was one of the few (or only) VM packages that OS/2 could be installed in. Microsoft removed OS/2 support from Virtual PC after they bought it..
It used to run under Mac OS9 as well, I think MS stopped supporting mac os after they purchased them.
On 4/4/2011 2:32 AM, the doctor wrote:
I'd suggest looking into VirtualBox, VMWare, Parallels or Virtual PC. Al >> which should allow you to handle a virtual instance of said software with >> virtual audio and network hardware that's pretty well supported, far more >> easily than trying to get native hardware working
VirtualBox for the win. VB is free, and easilly as good as Parallels.
Agreed, though VirtualBox for a mostly headless server is a pita, VMWare Server or ESX/i is nice, and VMWare workstation is far more polished IMHO. would so switch to PC/FreeBSD if I could get a virtual host environment like VMWare or VirtualBox on it.
Virtual PC is horrible.
Agreed... to me the biggest thing going for it is you can setup a virtual drive, and reboot into with Win7. Other than that, not much.
--
Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/
@MSGID: <4DF72031.1413.doveprg@tsgc.dyndns.org>
@TZ: c1e0
anyone want to try and make pcboard bbs 15.3 natrally telnetable?
i.e. make it like synchronet.
It is written in Bc 3.1 and Codebase. I can provide both.
O tryed a few times myself but don't know enoght to do it.
I can't understand all the LIB calls they used.
almost everything is a call to a LIB routine.
RE: PCBoard
BY: Corey to All on Invalid Time
@MSGID: <4DF72031.1413.doveprg@tsgc.dyndns.org>
@TZ: c1e0
anyone want to try and make pcboard bbs 15.3 natrally telnetable?
i.e. make it like synchronet.
It is written in Bc 3.1 and Codebase. I can provide both.
O tryed a few times myself but don't know enoght to do it.
I can't understand all the LIB calls they used.
almost everything is a call to a LIB routine.
Is there source out there? i didn't think this one was uh 'open' or whatever...
If it is very modular there is some hope of easily doing it, but I'm not goi to promise anything...........
Re: Android
By: Corey to All on Mon Dec 19 2011 11:54:26
Corey - Reviving a ~1yr old thread... sorry...
Do you still have pcb 15.3 sources with your updates? If so, I'd love a copy
jasonbrent at gmail.com
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to Elmer Fudd on Thu May 24 2012 22:56:40
Awesome. Can you send a copy to jasonbrent at gmail.com by chance?
-jbl
will it hold about 15 megs?
also you need Borland C++ 3.1
thats what it was compiled with. unless you want to convert it.
and codeview, but I can give you that.
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to Elmer Fudd on Fri May 25 2012 16:56:27
will it hold about 15 megs?
Yes. Apparently gmail accepts up to 25MB/message.
also you need Borland C++ 3.1
Ok. Located something slightly newer, but I can work on that.
thats what it was compiled with. unless you want to convert it.
.... converting is my intention. After I make it compile "out of the box".
and codeview, but I can give you that.
Ok, cool. I had a harder time locating codeview. Not successful yet.
-jbl
only the main bbs exe has a working makefile.
I never needed to mod any other program.
I tryed to port it over to bc 5.5 once.
but it is so old, I am now mostly hairless. i.e. SCREAM, RIP, etc.
what is your email again?
only the main bbs exe has a working makefile.jasonbrent at gmail.com
I never needed to mod any other program.
I tryed to port it over to bc 5.5 once.
but it is so old, I am now mostly hairless. i.e. SCREAM, RIP, etc.
what is your email again?
Re: PCBoard
By: Elmer Fudd to Corey on Fri May 25 2012 03:46 pm
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to Elmer Fudd on Thu May 24 2012 22:56:40
Awesome. Can you send a copy to jasonbrent at gmail.com by chance?
-jbl
will it hold about 15 megs?
also you need Borland C++ 3.1
thats what it was compiled with. unless you want to convert it.
and codeview, but I can give you that.
Quick Basic? I personally prefer Borland Pascal Based BBS's.Do you still have pcb 15.3 sources with your updates? If so, I'd love a copyyep.
only the main bbs exe has a working makefile.
I never needed to mod any other program.
I tryed to port it over to bc 5.5 once.
but it is so old, I am now mostly hairless. i.e. SCREAM, RIP, etc.
Re: PCBoard
By: Corey to Elmer Fudd on Fri May 25 2012 19:44:30
only the main bbs exe has a working makefile.
I never needed to mod any other program.
I tryed to port it over to bc 5.5 once.
but it is so old, I am now mostly hairless. i.e. SCREAM, RIP, etc.
I found a copy from Trifle and got it to compile on Win98.
I've started porting it forward under Win7 using BC55 and TASM5. About 10% d with the libraries at this point.
I'm not sure what my end-game is here, but I'd love to see this compilable/runnable under current Win32 and maybe Linux/MacOS with gcc.
Will see how far I get before I get bored. :-)
-jbl
great. he is the one who fixed my 15.3 source code.
I paid over 1800.00 for a source code license to my 10 node pcboard
system. 2 obj were missing from my discs, the license obj and the node
obj. trifle patched around both those objs for me. but it wont fully
compile with bc 3.1 on a nt system. some files give a GP error while
trying to compile. and I hated to ask him to do more for me, with dos
bbses mostly a hobby now. When you fix it for a modern compiler, can you send me a copy? I can run it fine on a nt system with dial up or net2bbs, but cant do any mods to it. thanks.
wow, I finally got pcboard 15.3 to compile and run ok.
what a job. source code was like a maze.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 105 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 07:27:16 |
Calls: | 5,571 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 8,493 |
D/L today: |
654 files (550M bytes) |
Messages: | 357,183 |