• Ezycom BBS

    From The Millionaire@VERT/PARKAVE to All on Tue Apr 12 14:13:01 2011
    For anyone who's interested, you can register for 4 nodes free for Ezycom BBS now. Anything higher than 4 will require a payment. Version 2.15 will be out sometime soon I hope. It's still in Gamma mode right now.

    $ The Millionaire $
    Park Avenue Place
    Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █


    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Park Avenue Place - parkave.synchro.net
  • From thinktank@VERT/INLANDUT to The Millionaire on Tue Apr 12 16:17:17 2011
    Re: Ezycom BBS
    By: The Millionaire to All on Tue Apr 12 2011 02:13 pm

    For anyone who's interested, you can register for 4 nodes free for Ezycom BBS now. Anything higher than 4 will require a payment. Version 2.15 will
    be out sometime soon I hope. It's still in Gamma mode right now.
    I have my key, but I did try and experiment with it. Maybe if a Win32 or beyond application can not happen, maybe we will see an ecom station application instead.

    ~ I am on twitter: @thinktank79 on Twitter ~

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Inland Utopia - inlandutopia.etowns.org
  • From Nightfox to thinktank on Wed Apr 13 13:04:08 2011
    I have my key, but I did try and experiment with it. Maybe if a Win32 or beyond application can not happen, maybe we will see an ecom station application instead.

    It seems that OS/2 / eComStation is still fairly popular for BBSing, which seems a little surprising to me, considering that OS/2 and eComStation are now fairly obscure OSes. I didn't think there was much OS/2 software development going on anymore. I have a copy of OS/2, but it's very hard to install on newer computers (probably due to driver issues). Do you know if eComStation
    is fairly easy to get going?

    Nightfox
  • From John Guillory@VERT/MAINLINE to Nightfox on Thu Apr 14 01:21:22 2011
    Re: Re: Ezycom BBS
    By: Nightfox to thinktank on Wed Apr 13 2011 01:04 pm

    It seems that OS/2 / eComStation is still fairly popular for BBSing, which seems a little surprising to me, considering that OS/2 and eComStation are now fairly obscure OSes. I didn't think there was much OS/2 software development going on anymore. I have a copy of OS/2, but it's very hard to install on newer computers (probably due to driver issues). Do you know if eComStation is fairly easy to get going?
    I hear ya, I got OS/2 Warp 3 working in a Virtual Machine, if I could get
    internet it'd probably be my main OS... I ordered eComStation, but
    something happened and my credit card didn't go through when I had enough
    money to buy 2-3 copies in my account. Later, something or the other
    happened and I bought the Warp 3 and no longer have the money for
    eComstation. Any way, if there's something you need for OS/2 and it's
    fairly simple, let me know. I've got Borland Pascal 7 with the OS/2
    16-bit patch to make 16-bit software. I'd like to find the patch for
    OS/2 Family mode applications, I know good and well they used to have one
    for making family mode applications in Borland Pascal 7. Those applications
    would run in either DOS or OS/2 mode just the same from the same executable.



    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Roach Guts - roachguts.com
  • From Nightfox to John Guillory on Thu Apr 14 07:58:18 2011
    Re: Re: Ezycom BBS
    By: John Guillory to Nightfox on Thu Apr 14 2011 01:21:22

    I hear ya, I got OS/2 Warp 3 working in a Virtual Machine, if I could get
    internet it'd probably be my main OS... I ordered eComStation, but

    I also have OS/2 going in a VM (finally!). I used to use OS/2 occasionally in the mid-90s, and now that I've had a chance to use it again, I'm somewhat surprised that you seem to have to reboot for just about every change.. Even changing the screen resolution requires a reboot. It's worse than Windows! (although to Windows' credit, Windows has been getting better about that.)

    I wonder what ways eComStation differs from OS/2 Warp 4..

    eComstation. Any way, if there's something you need for OS/2 and it's
    fairly simple, let me know. I've got Borland Pascal 7 with the OS/2

    Thanks :)

    Nightfox
  • From the doctor@VERT/QBBS to NIGHTFOX on Thu Apr 14 21:20:00 2011

    --- NIGHTFOX wrote --

    I wonder what ways eComStation differs from OS/2 Warp 4.

    I used to have to support OS/2. I'd rather nail my foot to the floor.

    That being said, I've played with ecomstation. It is Warp 4, with a modernised desktop and more drivers.


    ---
    ■ TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKseven ■ telnet/http bbs.cortex-media.info
  • From John Guillory@VERT/MAINLINE to the doctor on Thu Apr 14 15:15:06 2011
    Re: OS/2
    By: the doctor to NIGHTFOX on Thu Apr 14 2011 09:20 pm

    That being said, I've played with ecomstation. It is Warp 4, with a modernised desktop and more drivers.
    According to their ads, you can run unix xwindows and possibly some 32-bit
    windows apps that run in Wine from Unix in OS/2. Does it still support
    running other DOS versions like in Warp 3? Eg. using the boot from
    disk app on the desktop, which I fainlty remember modifying a bit to
    run a disk image instead of having to have the boot disk in A:...
    In the day, I used to do that to test my apps with MS-DOS 3.3, 5.0,
    PC-DOS 5.0, and if I really wanted to get crazy, I got a copy of
    MS-DOS 2.0 and PC-DOS 1.0 at a time...



    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Roach Guts - roachguts.com
  • From the doctor@VERT/QBBS to JOHN GUILLORY on Thu Apr 14 23:22:00 2011

    --- JOHN GUILLORY wrote --
    According to their ads, you can run unix xwindows and possibly some 32-
    windows apps that run in Wine from Unix in OS/2. Does it still suppor
    running other DOS versions like in Warp 3? Eg. using the boot fro
    disk app on the desktop, which I fainlty remember modifying a bit t
    run a disk image instead of having to have the boot disk in A:..
    In the day, I used to do that to test my apps with MS-DOS 3.3, 5.0
    PC-DOS 5.0, and if I really wanted to get crazy, I got a copy o
    MS-DOS 2.0 and PC-DOS 1.0 at a time..

    I haven't played with it in years. I toyed with the idea of making my BBS
    run on it... I think there is a port of Ruby for OS/2.

    I also remember hearing about a port of Wine for it.

    I might dig it out and have a play!


    ---
    ■ TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKseven ■ telnet/http bbs.cortex-media.info
  • From Nightfox to the doctor on Thu Apr 14 23:11:17 2011
    Re: OS/2
    By: the doctor to NIGHTFOX on Thu Apr 14 2011 21:20:00

    I used to have to support OS/2. I'd rather nail my foot to the floor.

    Haha, was it really that bad?

    That being said, I've played with ecomstation. It is Warp 4, with a modernised desktop and more drivers.

    I wonder if eComStation can be installed on modern PCs more easily than OS/2..

    Nightfox
  • From the doctor@VERT/QBBS to NIGHTFOX on Fri Apr 15 10:56:00 2011

    --- NIGHTFOX wrote --

    I wonder if eComStation can be installed on modern PCs more easily than OS

    I think so. I think they have written drivers for more modern stuff.


    ---
    ■ TARDIS BBS - Home of QUARKseven ■ telnet/http bbs.cortex-media.info
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Nightfox on Sun Apr 17 02:22:55 2011
    On 4/14/2011 11:11 PM, Nightfox wrote:
    I used to have to support OS/2. I'd rather nail my foot to the floor.

    Haha, was it really that bad?

    I used to do 2nd level support for iomega in the early 90's, one of the few on the OS/2 queue specifically (most of my calls were OS/2 or jazz drive)... probably why I'm so paranoid about redundant copies of everything now (that and a few mishaps with personal projects... thanks source-control (svn/cvs) and dropbox.

    I liked it a lot back then, but when NT4 came out (late '96 iirc), I switched and never really looked back. NT3.51 wasn't as good as OS/2 imho, but NT4 passed it (think Warp 3 was current at that time).

    That being said, I've played with ecomstation. It is Warp 4, with a
    modernised desktop and more drivers.

    I wonder if eComStation can be installed on modern PCs more easily than OS/2..

    Yes... though still wouldn't recommend it if you don't *NEED* it.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Roughneck BBS - telnet://roughneckbbs.com - www.roughneckbbs.com
  • From Nightfox to Tracker1 on Sun Apr 17 10:48:31 2011
    Re: Re: OS/2
    By: Tracker1 to Nightfox on Sun Apr 17 2011 02:22:55

    I liked it a lot back then, but when NT4 came out (late '96 iirc), I switche and never really looked back. NT3.51 wasn't as good as OS/2 imho, but NT4 passed it (think Warp 3 was current at that time).

    I used OS/2 a little bit in the 90s and liked it too.. Recently I started playing with OS/2 again in a virtual machine, and now I'm not sure I like it as much as I used to. For instance, I'm used to being able to type a drive location in the GUI when browsing the computer, and OS/2's GUI doesn't seem to let you do that.. Also, OS/2 seems to need rebooting after many little
    changes - It even needs to reboot if you change the screen resolution. And I thought Windows used to be bad about rebooting after changing..

    I wonder if eComStation can be installed on modern PCs more easily than OS

    Yes... though still wouldn't recommend it if you don't *NEED* it.

    ah.. I thought it might be at least interesting to see anyway.

    Nightfox
  • From Poindexter Fortran@VERT/REALITY to Nightfox on Wed Apr 20 10:34:07 2011
    Re: Re: Ezycom BBS
    By: Nightfox to thinktank on Wed Apr 13 2011 01:04 pm


    It seems that OS/2 / eComStation is still fairly popular for BBSing, which seems a little surprising to me, considering that OS/2 and eComStation are n fairly obscure OSes.

    Yeah, but OS/2 multitasked console windows far better than any other OS at the time. Running multiple console nodes of a BBS under Windows was tough, but not a problem for OS/2.

    --pF

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ realitycheckBBS -- http://realitycheckBBS.org
  • From Nightfox to Poindexter Fortran on Wed Apr 20 17:53:43 2011
    Re: Re: Ezycom BBS
    By: Poindexter Fortran to Nightfox on Wed Apr 20 2011 10:34:07

    Yeah, but OS/2 multitasked console windows far better than any other OS at t time. Running multiple console nodes of a BBS under Windows was tough, but n a problem for OS/2.

    Yeah, I remember OS/2 being able to multi-task console windows fairly well. I thought DESQView (for DOS) was fairly good at that too..

    Nightfox