pablodraw server up @ bbs-a-holic.info port 14400
a place ansi artist and sysops can be
Re: pablodraw
By: Sudden Death to All on Sat Aug 04 2012 12:49 pm
pablodraw server up @ bbs-a-holic.info port 14400
a place ansi artist and sysops can be
if you're going to advertise it, are you going to have it up longer than
one day out of the month?
Re: pablodraw
By: Sudden Death to All on Sat Aug 04 2012 12:49 pm
pablodraw server up @ bbs-a-holic.info port 14400
a place ansi artist and sysops can be
if you're going to advertise it, are you going to have it up longer than one day out of the month?
reminds me of the old days.
Don't call my BBS past 10pm, or in the morning, but when my parents are at work it is online, till about 6pm. then back at 730pm, but not after 10pm i they will take my modem.
PhantomRage Studios BBS!
--- COREY wrote --
reminds me of the old days
--- COREY wrote --
reminds me of the old days
I remember voice validating all my users. I used to implore people to leave their real names, as parents were often confused when I called up and asked them if "Death Knight" or "The Obliesk" were in...
--- COREY wrote --
yeah realy
and when the masked death bringer was only 12 years old...
Ah, Excuse Me, Is Bobby there
I'd kill for some 12 year old users. Any users! (;
--- POINDEXTER FORTRAN wrote --
I seem to get a lot of new users, but only a couple of repeat users. Ah, f the days when I had 60 callers a day -- on a single phone line
yeah realy.
and when the masked death bringer was only 12 years old....
Ah, Excuse Me, Is Bobby there?
I remember voice validating all my users. I used to implore people toYeah, I can imagine some of my older handles, though I allways used real
leave their real names, as parents were often confused when I called up
and asked them if "Death Knight" or "The Obliesk" were in...
--- JOHN GUILLORY wrote --
Yeah, I can imagine some of my older handles, though I allways used rea
names when logging in... Only when handles was semi-forced would I use
I remember in one of the dungeon games, I used to go by the name of
Sh*t K*cker (where *'s where replaced with the same vowel). And
Death Master I think or Dr Death.... Can you imagine working in a
office, and you leave your work phone number. The secretary answer
the phone and you ask her, "Yes, I need to speak to Pappa Pimp
she says "One moment, while I see what extension that is..." Then yo
interrupt and say, "Could you look up Freaky Geek's extension while you
at it, he apparently works here too."
--- COREY wrote --
reminds me of the old days
I remember voice validating all my users. I used to implore people to l their real names, as parents were often confused when I called up and as them if "Death Knight" or "The Obliesk" were in...
--- STARBASE wrote --
You can still do the voice valdate and all.
--- STARBASE wrote --
You can still do the voice valdate and all.
That's not such a bad idea...
I remember voice validating all my users. I used to implore people to l their real names, as parents were often confused when I called up and as them if "Death Knight" or "The Obliesk" were in...
You can still do the voice valdate and all.
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a free call anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anything to call them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human aspect to something that is usually lacking these days.
--- MRO wrote --
why dont you just close your ports :D that way you get no usersThat would solve a problem I don't have... (;
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a free call anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anything to cal them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human aspect to something that is usually lacking these days.
Re: voice validate
By: Starbase to the doctor on Fri Aug 17 2012 23:17:10
I remember voice validating all my users. I used to implore people to their real names, as parents were often confused when I called up and them if "Death Knight" or "The Obliesk" were in...
You can still do the voice valdate and all.
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a free call anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anything to cal them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human aspect to something that is usually lacking these days.
Re: voice validate
By: The Dark Rider to Starbase on Sat Aug 18 2012 11:49 pm
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a free cal anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anything to call them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human aspect to something that is usually lacking these days.
okay but what about the people that dont want total strangers calling them at random hours and trying to chat them up?
i dont want anybody i dont know calling me up.
--- MRO wrote --
why dont you just close your ports :D that way you get no users
That would solve a problem I don't have... (;
Re: voice validate
By: The Dark Rider to Starbase on Sat Aug 18 2012 11:49 pm
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a free cal anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anything to them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human aspect something that is usually lacking these days.
Good point. I've got a Comcast phone line that came along with my cable/internet bundle; only gets used for overseas inbound calls from family It's got free nationwide calling in the US, and overseas prices are pretty cheap nowadays.
I just wired up an old analog modem to my BBS; it's not supported under Wind 7, but passes through to the VM running the BBS just fine. I crashmailed yesterday with it, it was the first time I heard modem tones in YEARS!
poindexter fortran | pfortran at realitycheckbbs dot org
--- THE MILLIONAIRE wrote --
You can also go into the CFG and toggle the line that says Accept New User
To System to NO and that will solve the problem too. :-
Yeah I used to love hearing my USR 56K answer with FD212! It was a blast. He did you find out how to get Synchronet working with a VM so you can get incoming requests for telnet, services, ftp, web and mail? Thanks. :-)
Re: voice validate
By: The Millionaire to Poindexter Fortran on Sun Aug 19 2012 12:56 pm
Yeah I used to love hearing my USR 56K answer with FD212! It was a blast. did you find out how to get Synchronet working with a VM so you can get incoming requests for telnet, services, ftp, web and mail? Thanks. :-)
I've been running realitycheckBBS from a VM for the past year or so. I use VMWare Player, and set it to bridged networking - not NAT. My router sees it just another IP on my network. I use port forwarding and DHCP reservations t open ports outside of my firewall and to make sure the BBS VM always gets th same IP address.
It's a great solution - I can back it up quickly, keep a backup of the whole system onhand, and keep my BBS on new hardware with RAID that's idle most of the time.
poindexter fortran | pfortran at realitycheckbbs dot org
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a free cal anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anything to call them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human aspect to something that is usually lacking these days.okay but what about the people that dont want total strangers calling them at random hours and trying to chat them up?
i dont want anybody i dont know calling me up.
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a free cal anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anything to them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human aspect something that is usually lacking these days.
Good point. I've got a Comcast phone line that came along with my cable/internet bundle; only gets used for overseas inbound calls from family It's got free nationwide calling in the US, and overseas prices are pretty cheap nowadays.
I just wired up an old analog modem to my BBS; it's not supported under Wind 7, but passes through to the VM running the BBS just fine. I crashmailed yesterday with it, it was the first time I heard modem tones in YEARS!
Well I'm running Vmware Fusion with Win XP SP3 on a iMac on a cable modem. D you think Vmware Player will work just tha same as Fusion for my application purposes?
Re: voice validate
By: The Millionaire to Poindexter Fortran on Sun Aug 19 2012 06:17 pm
Well I'm running Vmware Fusion with Win XP SP3 on a iMac on a cable modem you think Vmware Player will work just tha same as Fusion for my applicat purposes?
It should. At my day job, I support a linux desktop VM with Active Directory extensions -- it works with Fusion, Player and Workstation. All of the setti are virtually (no pun intended) identical.
poindexter fortran | pfortran at realitycheckbbs dot org
again a couple of weeks ago), I'd give them my Google Voice number, let it drop to VM and call him back. You're right, though, a lot of people
wouldn't want to be bothered.
Email validation might be a better option? (I apologize if it's already
been covered.)
80 GB hard disk and 2 GB of RAM into it, and installed PBX in a Flash so I could get Asterisk with minimal headaches. I've got one of my GV accounts hooked in through that, and then I got a $25 VoIP ATA made by Grandstream
so I could use a real phone with it. It works with modems as well (up to about 9600 baud, maybe 14.4k if I'm lucky that day, and of course it's got to be /ARQ or else there's bad line noise).
The only problem I have with my bbs is no incoming responses whatsoever therefore only outgoing responses.
Re: voice validate
By: The Dark Rider to Mro on Sun Aug 19 2012 08:32 pm
again a couple of weeks ago), I'd give them my Google Voice number, let i drop to VM and call him back. You're right, though, a lot of people wouldn't want to be bothered.
Email validation might be a better option? (I apologize if it's already been covered.)
i remember one time in the dialup days, i was talking to a female user onlin and she was helping me test something and it disconnected her. i called her voice and asked her to call back. it sort of freaked her out, maybe i broke through some sort of bbs > real life wall :D
Re: voice validate
By: The Dark Rider to Poindexter Fortran on Sun Aug 19 2012 08:39 pm
80 GB hard disk and 2 GB of RAM into it, and installed PBX in a Flash so could get Asterisk with minimal headaches. I've got one of my GV accounts hooked in through that, and then I got a $25 VoIP ATA made by Grandstream so I could use a real phone with it. It works with modems as well (up to about 9600 baud, maybe 14.4k if I'm lucky that day, and of course it's go to be /ARQ or else there's bad line noise).
i have a dialup number. a guy forwards from the number to my telnet addy. some day i will rig up something to call it via dialup. that's really one of dreams is to call my own bbs with a real modem and phone line again.
Re: voice validate
By: The Millionaire to Poindexter Fortran on Mon Aug 20 2012 12:44 pm
The only problem I have with my bbs is no incoming responses whatsoever therefore only outgoing responses.
open up the ports
Re: voice validate
By: Poindexter Fortran to The Dark Rider on Sun Aug 19 2012 08:52:44
Well, with Google Voice, as long as they're in the US, they're a f anyway... so if you're also in the States, it won't cost you anyth them and voice-validate. If anything, it will add the extra human something that is usually lacking these days.
Good point. I've got a Comcast phone line that came along with my cable/internet bundle; only gets used for overseas inbound calls from It's got free nationwide calling in the US, and overseas prices are p cheap nowadays.
I've got a decently powered old desktop machine I had laying about, put
GB hard disk and 2 GB of RAM into it, and installed PBX in a Flash so I
get Asterisk with minimal headaches. I've got one of my GV accounts hook through that, and then I got a $25 VoIP ATA made by Grandstream so I cou
a real phone with it. It works with modems as well (up to about 9600 bau maybe 14.4k if I'm lucky that day, and of course it's got to be /ARQ or there's bad line noise).
I just wired up an old analog modem to my BBS; it's not supported und
7, but passes through to the VM running the BBS just fine. I crashmai yesterday with it, it was the first time I heard modem tones in YEARS
That's awesome! I do my BBSing using Telix for DOS in a DOSBox window, a works pretty well. For any earlier Windows games and whatnot that I want use/play, I have a Win2K VM on VirtualBox. For the modem stuff, I need t
my old laptop, and right now that's actually at work because it's more u
to me there (i.e. for managing an old school Merlin MAGIX piece of work,
Re: voice validate
By: The Dark Rider to Poindexter Fortran on Sun Aug 19 2012 08:39 pm
80 GB hard disk and 2 GB of RAM into it, and installed PBX in a Flash could get Asterisk with minimal headaches. I've got one of my GV acco hooked in through that, and then I got a $25 VoIP ATA made by Grandst
so I could use a real phone with it. It works with modems as well (up about 9600 baud, maybe 14.4k if I'm lucky that day, and of course it'
to be /ARQ or else there's bad line noise).
i have a dialup number. a guy forwards from the number to my telnet addy some day i will rig up something to call it via dialup. that's really on dreams is to call my own bbs with a real modem and phone line again.
i remember one time in the dialup days, i was talking to a female user onlin and she was helping me test something and it disconnected her. i called her voice and asked her to call back. it sort of freaked her out, maybe i broke through some sort of bbs > real life wall :D
Re: voice validate
By: Mro to The Dark Rider on Tue Aug 21 2012 01:40:55
i remember one time in the dialup days, i was talking to a female user on and she was helping me test something and it disconnected her. i called h voice and asked her to call back. it sort of freaked her out, maybe i br through some sort of bbs > real life wall :D
Yeah, I had that happen a couple of times to me. That said, I did actually make some friends from a simple voice validation call... I guess some people really did want someone to talk to on the phone, lol.
i have a dialup number. a guy forwards from the number to my telnet
addy. some day i will rig up something to call it via dialup. that's really one of dreams is to call my own bbs with a real modem and phone line again.
Yeah I would love to run a dialup bbs again myself one day again just for old times sake.
open up the ports
I have my ports open on Synchronet through the Windows Firewall. Only my
QWK comes in and that's it.
You can call your bbs via dialup right now. You have to hook your phone
line to a modem and have bbs software that listen for the incoming call. I use maximus bbs software that listens for a incoming call from the modem.
My line is magicjack line with filters. Works well. If you need help you
Yeah, I had that happen a couple of times to me. That said, I did actually make some friends from a simple voice validation call... I guess some
people really did want someone to talk to on the phone, lol.
--- MRO wrote --
I've made some lifelong friends through bbsing, and through bbsing on th internet. people i would trust everything with. it's too bad the rest of t people missed out on that type of community because it was a great way to good people in your area. now it's gone and never going to come back
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: the doctor to COREY on Wed Aug 15 2012 11:18 am
I'd kill for some 12 year old users. Any users! (;
I seem to get a lot of new users, but only a couple of repeat users. Ah, for the days when I had 60 callers a day -- on a single phone line!
poindexter FORTRAN | realitycheckbbs dot org
--- STARBASE wrote --
You can still do the voice valdate and all.
That's not such a bad idea...
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: the doctor to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Wed Aug 15 2012 06:42 pm
Sysops are not to blame
Re: voice validate
By: The Millionaire to the doctor on Sun Aug 19 2012 12:53 pm
But if you do not accept new users to your board would that defeat the purpose of the board?
--- STARBASE wrote --
No users on your board
--- STARBASE wrote --
Well the days have changed since the 80's. The bbs has taken a back scene most people are not thinking about telneting into a bbs or calling a bbs l they used to. All sysops would love regular users every day on they bbs. A sysop same here. So hang in there and keep plugging and the users should p
up to where you have regular user
Sysops are not to blame
But if you do not accept new users to your board would that defeat the purpo of the board?
Yeah. It's all Facebook now-a-days. I hate Facebook. It's a cruddy BBS.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: starbase to the doctor on Sun Sep 02 2012 09:05 pm
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: the doctor to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Wed Aug 15 2012 06:42 pm
Sysops are not to blame
Damn right, we're not. We try our hardest to please our users to make them a comfortable as possible when they visit our bbs.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
the.millionaire@parkave.synchro.net
--- STARBASE wrote --
No users on your board
I get users. Some folks even play Global Destruction.
I don't get posters though. Well, sometimes.
If you assume that the only purpose of a BBS is to accept new users, then ye But if you already had a small userbase and wanted the BBS to be the home of some private club, denying access to new users would in fact fulfill theIf you have a private club then that would make sense. Even though you could make certain messages areas only accessable to certain users.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to starbase on Sun Sep 02 2012 08:35 pm
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: starbase to the doctor on Sun Sep 02 2012 09:05 pm
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: the doctor to POINDEXTER FORTRAN on Wed Aug 15 2012 06:42 pm
Sysops are not to blame
Damn right, we're not. We try our hardest to please our users to make them a comfortable as possible when they visit our bbs.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
the.millionaire@parkave.synchro.net
Yeap been a sysop since 1985 trying to make the board as user friendly as possible. It all depends on the type of computer I have
Re: voice validate
By: The Millionaire to starbase on Sun Sep 02 2012 08:37 pm
I know. I guess we will still be a underground community. The bbs is always available to the public.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: the doctor to STARBASE on Mon Sep 03 2012 09:56 am
--- STARBASE wrote --
No users on your board
I get users. Some folks even play Global Destruction.
I don't get posters though. Well, sometimes.
It be great if we get talkers (posters). That one great aspect of a bbs
It be great if we get talkers (posters). That one great aspect of a bbs
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: Starbase to the doctor on Mon Sep 03 2012 02:19 pm
It be great if we get talkers (posters). That one great aspect of a bbs
Definitely. I appreciate the threading more on a BBS, and it's a heck of a lot less distracting; not to mention, it's got more of a personal "at home" feel to it.
this statement is meaningless.
I disagree!
--- STARBASE wrote --
No users on your board
I get users. Some folks even play Global Destruction.
I don't get posters though. Well, sometimes.
--- STARBASE wrote --
Well the days have changed since the 80's. The bbs has taken a back scene most people are not thinking about telneting into a bbs or calling a bbs
l they used to. All sysops would love regular users every day on they
bbs. A sysop same here. So hang in there and keep plugging and the users should p up to where you have regular user
Yeah. It's all Facebook now-a-days. I hate Facebook. It's a cruddy BBS.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: the doctor to STARBASE on Mon Sep 03 2012 09:57 am
Yeah. It's all Facebook now-a-days. I hate Facebook. It's a cruddy BBS.
Maybe BBSes were cruddy Facebooks? Maybe we should have set up privacy policies, then used personal info for entertainment, then sold personal
data to companies that could advertise on our BBSes, sold commercial accounts, and then made it almost impossible for users to control where their information was shared?
We missed the boat...
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: Starbase to the doctor on Mon Sep 03 2012 02:19 pm
It be great if we get talkers (posters). That one great aspect of a bbs
Definitely. I appreciate the threading more on a BBS, and it's a heck of a lot less distracting; not to mention, it's got more of a personal "at home" feel to it.
If things were still like the olden days nowadays then you would. The real posters are the loyal and dedicated users/sysops.
Definitely. I appreciate the threading more on a BBS, and it's a heck
of a lot less distracting; not to mention, it's got more of a personal "at home" feel to it.
Exactly. It's like walking into a great place where everybody gets along.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to the doctor on Tue Sep 04 2012 02:30 pm
If things were still like the olden days nowadays then you would. The real posters are the loyal and dedicated users/sysops.
i think now, if you are running a bbs and get a real user [not a visiting sysop], they are going to go straight for the games and maybe check out
what files you have. i would expect the europeans to be interested in what textfiles a bbs has.
Actually, when I was a user, I used to attack the message threads first and if I had time then I would go to the files/games afterwards.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to Mro on Tue Sep 04 2012 05:59 pm
Actually, when I was a user, I used to attack the message threads first and if I had time then I would go to the files/games afterwards.
well that was the old days. what we're doing now is in no way like the old days.
well that was the old days. what we're doing now is in no way like the old days.I choose to differ. The boards of today still have message areas as well as network message areas , as well as games and such. There is no difference between the old days and today. Basically the boards still run the same.
instead. Then another friend recommended me Synchronet and been runningAs to dos based bbs systems Maxiums is the best. I run that software on my dial up line using magicjack. As to the telnet side I started using Synchronet about 2 and 1/2 weeks ago. I still customizing it to look like my dial up board. My only difficulity right now is getting the dos based doors that work on maximus to work with synchronet. Still trying to fiquare it out. Maybe the software will go a lot further
for a while now. Modding and upgrading as often as I can. It was differe
me to run a Windows-Based BBS as I had only ran DOS-Based most of the ye
Now I'm used to it and it became second nature for me. Wonder how far Synchronet will go though. Time will only tell. :-)
Just wish we could still attract big crowds like we did in the olden dayBrings back memmories. I used to have up to 500 users on my board in Austin Tx back in the 80's and the 90's. It was a kool place. But us sysops from the 80's can only dream
Definitely. I appreciate the threading more on a BBS, and it's a heck o less distracting; not to mention, it's got more of a personal "at home"Amen brother. I love the personal at home feel
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: Mro to The Millionaire on Tue Sep 04 2012 07:03 pm
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to the doctor on Tue Sep 04 2012 02:30 pm
If things were still like the olden days nowadays then you would. real posters are the loyal and dedicated users/sysops.
i think now, if you are running a bbs and get a real user [not a visi sysop], they are going to go straight for the games and maybe check o what files you have. i would expect the europeans to be interested i textfiles a bbs has.
Actually, when I was a user, I used to attack the message threads first
I had time then I would go to the files/games afterwards.
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
the.millionaire@parkave.synchro.net
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: Mro to The Millionaire on Tue Sep 04 2012 10:19 pm
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to Mro on Tue Sep 04 2012 05:59 pm
Actually, when I was a user, I used to attack the message threads firs and if I had time then I would go to the files/games afterwards.
well that was the old days. what we're doing now is in no way like the ol days.
Well I'm still living there. :-P
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
the.millionaire@parkave.synchro.net
I choose to differ. The boards of today still have message areas as well as network message areas , as well as games and such. There is no difference between the old days and today. Basically the boards still run the same.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to Mro on Tue Sep 04 2012 08:35 pm
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: Mro to The Millionaire on Tue Sep 04 2012 10:19 pm
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to Mro on Tue Sep 04 2012 05:59 pm
Actually, when I was a user, I used to attack the message threads f and if I had time then I would go to the files/games afterwards.
well that was the old days. what we're doing now is in no way like the days.
Well I'm still living there. :-P
$ The Millionaire $
Park Avenue Place
Surrey, B.C., Canada █ ♠ █
the.millionaire@parkave.synchro.net
I am also still living in the old days
these days?) or flooded with activity. BBSing today has a lot of the look and some of the feel of the "old days", but a certain amount of the flavour and excitement has gone out of it, or turned to something new.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: Mro to The Millionaire on
Tue Sep 04 2012 22:19:00
well that was the old days. what we're doing now is in no way like the old days.I choose to differ. The boards of today still have message areas as well as network message areas , as well as games and such. There is no difference between the old days and today. Basically the boards still run the same.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: starbase to Mro on Wed Sep
05 2012 01:33:11
There is nothing wrong with the old days when a bbs was a community of people that knew each other in a good way.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to Starbase on Mon Sep 03 2012 12:54 pm
instead. Then another friend recommended me Synchronet and been running for a while now. Modding and upgrading as often as I can. It was differe me to run a Windows-Based BBS as I had only ran DOS-Based most of the ye Now I'm used to it and it became second nature for me. Wonder how far Synchronet will go though. Time will only tell. :-)As to dos based bbs systems Maxiums is the best. I run that software on my dial up line using magicjack. As to the telnet side I started using Synchronet about 2 and 1/2 weeks ago. I still customizing it to look like
my dial up board. My only difficulity right now is getting the dos based doors that work on maximus to work with synchronet. Still trying to fiquare it out. Maybe the software will go a lot further
Re: voice validate
By: The Millionaire to Starbase on Mon Sep 03 2012 12:55 pm
Just wish we could still attract big crowds like we did in the olden dayBrings back memmories. I used to have up to 500 users on my board in Austin Tx back in the 80's and the 90's. It was a kool place. But us sysops from the 80's can only dream
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: Dreamer to Starbase on Mon Sep 03 2012 02:35 pm
Definitely. I appreciate the threading more on a BBS, and it's a heck o less distracting; not to mention, it's got more of a personal "at home"Amen brother. I love the personal at home feel
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to the doctor on Tue Sep 04 2012 02:34 pm
My fingers are crossed
By the way my bbs is now up 24 hours telnet at trbbs.dyndns.org:81 or 70.112.111.194:81
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: starbase to Mro on Wed Sep 05 2012 01:33:00
I choose to differ. The boards of today still have message areas as well as network message areas , as well as games and such. There is no difference between the old days and today. Basically the boards still
run the same.
Basically most boards have the same stuff on them, but the atmosphere has changed quite a lot. You're not dialing and redialing for half an hour or more to get onto that popular BBS in your town, and when you do get there you're not exactly pressed for time (who really sets a strict time limit on their users these days?) or flooded with activity. BBSing today has a lot of the look and some of the feel of the "old days", but a certain amount of the flavour and excitement has gone out of it, or turned to something new.
echicken
electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
i think now, if you are running a bbs and get a real user [not a visiting sysop], they are going to go straight for the games and maybe check out what files you have. i would expect the europeans to be interested in wh textfiles a bbs has.
Actually, when I was a user, I used to attack the message threads first and I had time then I would go to the files/games afterwards.
Well I beg to differ. Fidonet is totally dead compared to the olden days where we SysOps used to get at least 125+ or so messages a day! Now, you're
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to Mro on Tue Sep 04 2012 17:59:07
i think now, if you are running a bbs and get a real user [not a visiting sysop], they are going to go straight for the games and
maybe check out what files you have. i would expect the europeans to be interested in wh textfiles a bbs has.
Actually, when I was a user, I used to attack the message threads first and I had time then I would go to the files/games afterwards.
I always read messages first, then maybe hit files once in a while. I went back to my old habits immediately, heh. I never play door games.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: The Millionaire to starbase on Wed Sep 05 2012 12:58 pm
Well I beg to differ. Fidonet is totally dead compared to the olden days where we SysOps used to get at least 125+ or so messages a day! Now, you're
That is in one day, in one echo.. Some echos like trek or some of the
others would pull in 300 msgs a day. And Users would still log on and dl a BW or qwk packet that took the 45 minutes to download. That always amuses me. BBS are so much faster, have more nodes, etc. Yet now people don't participate much. How about with those slow modems 1200, 2400. redrawing some of those ansi screens in the games took so long, now they fly. I think for a bbs to be used quite a bit it has to actually have a special niche now. Most of us sysops don't do this...
Have a good One!
Mike
--- STARBASE wrote --
I choose to differ. The boards of today still have message areas as well a network message areas , as well as games and such. There is no differenc between the old days and today. Basically the boards still run the same
--
When I got started, there were no games, and the only network was fidonet. One major difference (besides the fact that I had loads of active users who didn't actually run a BBS) was that the users were *local* and we used to meet up and do things.
I still have many of those friends, nearly 30 years later.
the users were *local* and we used to meet up and do things.
I still have many of those friends, nearly 30 years later.
--- STARBASE wrote --
I choose to differ. The boards of today still have message areas as well
a network message areas , as well as games and such. There is no
differenc between the old days and today. Basically the boards still run the same
--
When I got started, there were no games, and the only network was fidonet. One major difference (besides the fact that I had loads of active users who didn't actually run a BBS) was that the users were *local* and we used to meet up and do things.
I still have many of those friends, nearly 30 years later.
Re: Re: pablodraw
By: the doctor to STARBASE on Thu Sep 06 2012 08:46 am
When I got started, there were no games, and the only network was fidonet. One major difference (besides the fact that I had loads of active users who didn't actually run a BBS) was that the users were *local* and we used to meet up and do things.
I still have many of those friends, nearly 30 years later.
I can understand that.. I was not always, actually mostly not able to get
to local get togethers etc. But the odd thing I find, Most of the people I do know from those days, and were quite active to boot, Just don't have an interest in BBS'ing anymore. The go for the facebook, but have no inclination to bbs anymore. Oh they will log on, have some great memories, but then, leave it at that. Sad..
Have a good One!
Mike
In a lot of ways, I got to know people online better than in the real world people were much more candid when they had BBSes as a medium and interacted through handles.
By the time we met face to face (which we did quarterly, usually), we alread had a long history online.
By the way my bbs is now up 24 hours telnet at trbbs.dyndns.org:81 or
By the way my bbs is now up 24 hours telnet at trbbs.dyndns.org:81 or
local get togethers etc. But the odd thing I find, Most of the people I do k BBS'ing anymore. The go for the facebook, but have no inclination to bbs that. Sad..
Wish I could get mine working. :-(I can help with that
--- FIRST OFFICER wrote --
Re: Re: pablodra
By: the doctor to STARBASE on 36
When I got started, there were no games, and the only network was fidon One major difference (besides the fact that I had loads of active users didn't actually run a BBS) was that the users were *local* and we used meet up and do things
I still have many of those friends, nearly 30 years later
I can understand that.. I was not always, actually mostly not able to get
--- POINDEXTER FORTRAN wrote --
I'm going out for drinks tonight with a group of sysops and users fro
dialup 510 NPA BBSes. We're going to a bar that was conveniently placed NE DOOR to the home of realitycheckBBS in the 90s
In a lot of ways, I got to know people online better than in the real worl people were much more candid when they had BBSes as a medium and interacte through handles
By the time we met face to face (which we did quarterly, usually), we alre had a long history online
Basically most boards have the same stuff on them, but the atmosphere has some of the feel of the "old days", but a certain amount of the flavour and excitement has gone out of it, or turned to something new.I agree most board have same stuff but the sysop personnality goes into the board to give a home feeling. As to bring the excitement and flavour it is up to the sysops to push the excitement into future users and culvate it by example
By: Starbase to The Millionaire on Wed Sep 05 2012 12:47 amYes keep the dream alive. The bbs I run attaches me to the good old days.
it even now.
Way too high prices. Almost buried under themI am also still living in the old daysbut paying todays prices.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 91 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 07:27:33 |
Calls: | 4,903 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 8,491 |
Messages: | 350,500 |
Posted today: | 1 |