Full speed = way to fast. (this new) 99 = 57600 way to slow. Anyway, 01
- 99 are worthless speeds. Making the speed controls worthless on the
Full speed = way to fast. (this new) 99 = 57600 way to slow. Anyway, - 99 are worthless speeds. Making the speed controls worthless on the
Yes, a baud emulator that emulates every real baud that ever existed
ever is worthless!
Yes, this new baud emulates very real baud rate, you've also capped it at 57600. These are worthless speeds, if your looking at todays scrollers with several hunderd lines. By removing the CAP bottleneck that is now
Yes, this new baud emulates very real baud rate, you've also capped it at 57600. These are worthless speeds, if your looking at todays scrollers with several hunderd lines. By removing the CAP bottleneck that is now
code. Just because you wanted a REAL baud emulator that ever existed
peice of worthless shit. If i'm watching the several hundered line of
ansi art jet down the screen at light speed (the new full speed=00) that
to a rate that I can actually live with. Whatever.... i'm done..
bitching about this stupid idea that mades know fucking sence to me
Yep, clearly its myself and my ideas that are stupid here... Clearly.
|10∙|11·|07 (|15Captain|07 |15Hood|07 |11+O|07) |11·|10∙|07^^^^
|03{|11tHE|10.|11pIRATE|10.|14kING|03}|07 |08<|12AC|13i|12D|08>|07
--- Mystic BBS v1.10 A42 (Windows)
Common sense should tell you that either you are doing it wrong or something has changed or something is broken.
Did you ever stop to notice that no one else is complaining?
Hello g00r00,
On 02 Feb 15 08:45, g00r00 wrote to Skuz:
Common sense should tell you that either you are doing it wrong or something has changed or something is broken.
I emailed you about this over the weekend, I believe. I think something
is seriously broken on the Linux side. Any ansi that I had |DI99 in doesn't display at all, and seems to lock up the session until I hang up and call back. Once I take the MCI code out of the ansi, it displays
fine.
Did you even TRY the DI mci code outside of the art gallery?
Did you ever stop to notice that no one else is complaining?
Yep, clearly its myself and my ideas that are stupid here... Clearly.
Did you ever stop to notice that no one else is complaining?
My only complaint is that it stopped working completely for me! (so far, anyways. lol!)
I like most all your ideas and changes, just not this one. The mystic art gallery really sucks with the your new cap speed of 115200. That you
My only complaint is that it stopped working completely for me! (so f anyways. lol!)
I have not had the time to touch the linux side of things yet, But since it is a clone of the other board.. using DI99 on the longer ansi art. I
I like most all your ideas and changes, just not this one. The mystic gallery really sucks with the your new cap speed of 115200. That you
I don't know if you are trying to be a troll or what your fucking
problem is, but there is an obvious bug in the art gallery. You can't possibly be just ignoring everything I say to you?
If you think going off on some sort of rant about how my ideas are
stupid and worthless because there is an obvious art gallery bug is something that will benefit you or Mystic in the future, then I don't
know what the fuck to tell you.
Breathe, guys.
Breathe, guys.
Thanks, but am absolutely not the one you need to be saying this to.
Before all of you have a mental breakdown... DI is not implmeneted in Linux yet.
Breathe, guys.
His problem isn't with Mystic its with his own approach and lack of attention. The software isn't changing anything the end user would ever
Did you ever stop to notice that no one else is complaining?Sure, they most all like your new A61 DI speed changes, or never used DI to begin with, in the why I've been using it. I'm sure there are a few
not even running with A61 yet and not effected.
when i get long or to many ansi at login i hit the space bar because that stops it. ;p
There nothing wrong with my attention. A61 did change the DI speed, that is the truth. I did expect to see the changes after I upgraded, because
I read the whatsnew.txt It effected all ansi with a |DIxx in it, truth.
people using my stuff, and I *NEVER* deal with the shit I have to deal with from this tiny BBS scene. It's a shame that a few people may ruin this for everyone...
I create WoW addons too, and there are thousands upon thousands of
people using my stuff, and I *NEVER* deal with the shit I have to deal with from this tiny BBS scene. It's a shame that a few people may ruin this for everyone...
I think we all do that from time to time.. when we get tired to seeing
the same old thing over and over again. It's a shame that we don't have ansi artist pounding out cool artwork to all the telnet boards any more. The good new is that blocktronics will release another pack a 4pm EST today.
On 02/04/15, g00r00 said the following...
people using my stuff, and I *NEVER* deal with the shit I have to dea with from this tiny BBS scene. It's a shame that a few people may ru this for everyone...
Well just so you know, there are many of us that appreciate all the effort and time you take with mystic. Sometimes even the loudest cheer
can not silence the quietest critic.. So fuckit bro, lockup 1.10 and
take a break. I am sure there is a ton of other shit you have been
putting on the back burner. If you come back and want to do more,
awesome, if Not, it wouldn't tarnish my view of ya.. You good peeps from what I know of ya. And mystic is a pure slice of wickedness..
Kidd
yeah but supposedly it is in bad taste to use art pack files on our systems... at least that's the take away i got from a recent
conversation in the last months about systems doing such...
yeah but supposedly it is in bad taste to use art pack files on our systems... at least that's the take away i got from a recent
conversation in the last months about systems doing such...
On 02/04/15, wkitty42 said the following...
yeah but supposedly it is in bad taste to use art pack files on our systems... at least that's the take away i got from a recent conversation in the last months about systems doing such...
The way I see it is, displaying stuff on your BBS of others' works should technically be fine as long as you don't alter the original piece and
try to "make it your own".
I figure most people would be fine with that, unless they explicitly
state "don't use mah shit on your BBS", and then I wouldn't. Like knocturnal, for example. I heard he doesn't like it, so anything of his
I wouldn't think about. Been trying to get a hold of him to ask if it'd
be okay though, since he was my co back in the day. =) I really like
his work, always have.
--- Mystic BBS v1.10 A62 (Windows)
I look at it this way. If I created something back in 1996 and 20
years later I ran across it on someones board being displayed with my
name still on it and not sitting collecting dust in a file area where NOONE is even looking anymore, I would think that was badass. I don't
think there is an artist from back in the day, if you actually got a
hold of him would tell you to not display that menu ansi because it was for made for Rivendale back in 1990 and they may put their bbs back online.. Or maybe I am wrong. I'll tell you this, I SUCK at drawing and the bbs scene is not booming with artists like it was in the past so If
i didn't use ansi's from the past I would just shut my bbs down cuz I can't stand to look at generic screens..
I think we all do that from time to time.. when we get tired to seeing
the same old thing over and over again. It's a shame that we don't
have ansi artist pounding out cool artwork to all the telnet boards
any more. The good new is that blocktronics will release another pack
a 4pm EST today.
Since it's 5:30pm central time here right now, I went looking. I only found this:
"This artpack will be released on February 4, 2015 (4pm UTC/GMT-3)!"
I think that's more like 8pm Eastern, isn't it?
On 02/04/15, Kidd Wicked said the following...
I look at it this way. If I created something back in 1996 and 20 years later I ran across it on someones board being displayed with my name still on it and not sitting collecting dust in a file area where NOONE is even looking anymore, I would think that was badass. I don't
Same. I'd be like, "Well, shit. I did that!"
think there is an artist from back in the day, if you actually got a hold of him would tell you to not display that menu ansi because it w for made for Rivendale back in 1990 and they may put their bbs back online.. Or maybe I am wrong. I'll tell you this, I SUCK at drawing a the bbs scene is not booming with artists like it was in the past so i didn't use ansi's from the past I would just shut my bbs down cuz I can't stand to look at generic screens..
I do passable ASCII lettering. That's it. Anything else and I suck sweaty goat balls. And I've recently come to realize that ASCII lettering for
BBS menus still look fairly... plain. So I wrote a login ANSI randomizer for the TG board I'm setting up with a bunch of really kickass stuff
from Blocktronics. Lot of enzo stuff I put up as well, I saw after. A
lot of knockturnal stuff I wanted to throw on there, but like I said,
not gonna unless I can get his permission.
Aaaaaanyway, the point is I'm gonna test it out with the TG board and see what user reactions are. If it's mostly positive, then I'll probably
toss a bunch of really excellent ones on this one. But yeah, I really
wish I could coerce someone to do a few for this one. It'd be pretty sweet.
I think that's more like 8pm Eastern, isn't it?
Yeah well Enzo backed the time up to 10pm his time so that = 8pm
here.. so right about now it should be releasing .. because time is
up.
I like most all your ideas and changes, just not this one. The mystic a gallery really sucks with the your new cap speed of 115200. That you
I don't know if you are trying to be a troll or what your fucking problem is but there is an obvious bug in the art gallery. You can't possibly be just ignoring everything I say to you?
I don't know if you are trying to be a troll or what your fucking probl
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 103 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 02:16:10 |
| Calls: | 3,413 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 8,461 |
| Messages: | 335,812 |
| Posted today: | 10 |